Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Jul;23(7):1017-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.12.037. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of palpating crepitus to diagnose rotator cuff tears.
Seventy consecutive consenting patients who presented with shoulder pain and no previous imaging or surgery on the affected shoulder were prospectively enrolled during a 10-month period. A standardized patient history and examination, including the crepitus test, were recorded in addition to obtaining standard radiographs. Additional imaging after initial evaluation was performed with magnetic resonance imaging and interpreted by a musculoskeletal radiologist blinded to the examination findings. Statistical analysis was used to determine sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the crepitus test in the clinical diagnosis of a rotator cuff tear.
Sixty-three patients had histories, examinations, and imaging studies available for analysis. The crepitus test had a sensitivity of 67%, specificity of 80%, PPV of 91%, and NPV of 43% for all types of rotator cuff tears. The sensitivity and specificity for full-thickness or high-grade partial tears was 82% and 73%, respectively; the PPV and NPV were 77% and 79%. Increasing age improved accuracy as the presence of crepitus in patients older than 55 years had a sensitivity of 76%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, and NPV of 38%.
The crepitus test has a favorable sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV to assess the integrity of the rotator cuff and may be a useful examination in the clinical diagnosis of a rotator cuff tear.
本研究旨在评估触诊捻发音诊断肩袖撕裂的准确性。
在 10 个月的时间内,前瞻性纳入 70 例连续同意的肩部疼痛且受影响肩部无先前影像学或手术的患者。除了获得标准的影像学检查外,还记录了标准化的病史和体格检查,包括捻发音检查。初始评估后的额外影像学检查采用磁共振成像(MRI)进行,并由一位对检查结果不知情的肌肉骨骼放射科医生进行解读。统计分析用于确定捻发音检查在临床诊断肩袖撕裂中的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。
63 例患者有可供分析的病史、体格检查和影像学研究。捻发音检查对所有类型的肩袖撕裂的敏感性为 67%,特异性为 80%,PPV 为 91%,NPV 为 43%。全层或高级部分撕裂的敏感性和特异性分别为 82%和 73%;PPV 和 NPV 分别为 77%和 79%。随着年龄的增加,准确性也有所提高,因为 55 岁以上患者出现捻发音的敏感性为 76%,特异性为 100%,PPV 为 100%,NPV 为 38%。
捻发音检查对评估肩袖完整性具有良好的敏感性、特异性、PPV 和 NPV,可能是肩袖撕裂临床诊断中的有用检查。