Suppr超能文献

用于肱二头肌肌腱炎的科德曼手法:对一种被遗忘的检查手法的前瞻性评估。

Codman maneuver for biceps tendonitis: a prospective evaluation of a forgotten examination maneuver.

作者信息

Kopriva John M, Dawes Alexander M, Cooke Hayden L, Gillis Julianne W, Gottschalk Michael B, Wagner Eric R

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

JSES Int. 2025 Jan 16;9(3):698-704. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.12.011. eCollection 2025 May.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many physical exam maneuvers for shoulder pain exist, but the sensitivity and specificity are repeatedly found to be subpar, even in the most utilized maneuvers. Rotator cuff tendinopathy and biceps tendonitis are common pain generators that often go undifferentiated. The purpose of this study was to examine a century-old examination maneuver to help identify biceps tendinitis in patients presenting with anterior shoulder pain.

METHODS

Twenty-seven consecutive patients who presented to clinic in a 10-month period with shoulder pain, no osseous concerns on radiographs, and subsequently received an ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection (CSI) at the bicipital groove were prospectively enrolled. Our updated Codman maneuver was performed along with full and empty can tests in multiple planes. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores for each maneuver and isometric strength for the full and empty can tests were compared between patients who improved with ultrasound-guided CSI at the bicipital groove and those who did not.

RESULTS

24 of 27 patients responded favorably to CSI. Of these 24 patients, mean VAS scores across full and empty can maneuvers ranged from 4.4 (±3.2) to 5.5 (±3.0). Codman for biceps had a significantly higher mean VAS at 8.8 (±1.0). Conversely, Codman for supraspinatus had a significantly lower mean VAS score of 3.2 (±2.8).

CONCLUSION

The described Codman maneuver for biceps was correlated with patients who benefited from an ultrasound-guided CSI at the bicipital groove. Combining the Codman maneuver with patient-reported VAS pain scale is a promising maneuver for biceps tendinopathy.

摘要

背景

存在许多针对肩部疼痛的体格检查手法,但即使是最常用的手法,其敏感性和特异性也反复被发现不尽人意。肩袖肌腱病和肱二头肌肌腱炎是常见的疼痛根源,常常难以区分。本研究的目的是检验一种有百年历史的检查手法,以帮助识别前肩部疼痛患者的肱二头肌肌腱炎。

方法

前瞻性纳入了27例在10个月期间因肩部疼痛到诊所就诊、X线片无骨质问题且随后在肱二头肌沟接受超声引导下皮质类固醇注射(CSI)的连续患者。我们更新后的科德曼手法与多个平面的满罐和空罐试验一起进行。比较了在肱二头肌沟接受超声引导下CSI后病情改善的患者与未改善患者在每个手法的视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分以及满罐和空罐试验的等长肌力。

结果

27例患者中有24例对CSI反应良好。在这24例患者中,满罐和空罐手法的平均VAS评分在4.4(±3.2)至5.5(±3.0)之间。肱二头肌的科德曼手法平均VAS显著更高,为8.8(±1.0)。相反,冈上肌的科德曼手法平均VAS评分显著更低,为3.2(±2.8)。

结论

所描述的肱二头肌科德曼手法与在肱二头肌沟接受超声引导下CSI后获益的患者相关。将科德曼手法与患者报告的VAS疼痛量表相结合是诊断肱二头肌肌腱病的一种有前景的手法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9cc/12145046/c71a8e11ec86/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验