Food Technology Department, Lleida University, XaRTA-Postharvest, Agrotecnio Center, Av. Rovira Roure, 191, 25198 Lleida Catalonia, Spain.
IRTA, XaRTA-Postharvest, Edifici Fruitcentre, Parc Científic i Tecnològic Agroalimentari de Lleida, Parc de Gardeny, 25003 Lleida Catalonia, Spain.
Int J Food Microbiol. 2014 Jun 16;180:49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.04.011. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
Dilution plating is the quantification method commonly used to estimate the population level of postharvest biocontrol agents, but this method does not permit a distinction among introduced and indigenous strains. Recently, molecular techniques based on DNA amplification such as quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) have been successfully applied for their high strain-specific detection level. However, the ability of qPCR to distinguish viable and nonviable cells is limited. A promising strategy to avoid this issue relies on the use of nucleic acid intercalating dyes, such as propidium monoazide (PMA), as a sample pretreatment prior to the qPCR. The objective of this study was to optimize a protocol based on PMA pre-treatment samples combined with qPCR to distinguish and quantify viable cells of the biocontrol agent P. agglomerans CPA-2 applied as a postharvest treatment on orange. The efficiency of PMA-qPCR method under the established conditions (30μM PMA for 20min of incubation followed by 30min of LED light exposure) was evaluated on an orange matrix. Results showed no difference in CFU or cells counts of viable cells between PMA-qPCR and dilution plating. Samples of orange matrix inoculated with a mixture of viable/dead cells showed 5.59log10 CFU/ml by dilution plating, 8.25log10 cells/ml by qPCR, and 5.93log10 cells/ml by PMA-qPCR. Furthermore, samples inoculated with heat-killed cells were not detected by dilution plating and PMA-qPCR, while by qPCR was of 8.16log10 cells/ml. The difference in quantification cycles (Cq) among qPCR and PMA-qPCR was approximately 16cycles, which means a reduction of 65,536 fold of the dead cells detected. In conclusion, PMA-qPCR method is a suitable tool for quantify viable CPA-2 cells, which could be useful to estimate the ability of this antagonist to colonize the orange surface.
稀释平板计数法是一种常用的量化方法,用于估计采后生物防治剂的种群水平,但该方法无法区分引入菌株和土著菌株。最近,基于 DNA 扩增的分子技术,如实时定量 PCR(qPCR),已成功应用于其高菌株特异性检测水平。然而,qPCR 区分存活细胞和非存活细胞的能力有限。一种有前途的策略是在 qPCR 之前使用核酸嵌入染料,如吖啶橙单甲醚(PMA)进行样品预处理。本研究的目的是优化基于 PMA 预处理样品与 qPCR 相结合的方案,以区分和量化作为采后处理剂施用于橙子的生防剂 P. agglomerans CPA-2 的存活细胞。在建立的条件下(30μM PMA 孵育 20min,然后 LED 光暴露 30min),对 PMA-qPCR 方法的效率进行了评估。结果表明,在 PMA-qPCR 和稀释平板计数之间,存活细胞的 CFU 或细胞计数没有差异。用活/死细胞混合物接种的橙子基质样品,用稀释平板计数法检测到 5.59log10 CFU/ml,用 qPCR 法检测到 8.25log10 细胞/ml,用 PMA-qPCR 法检测到 5.93log10 细胞/ml。此外,用热灭活细胞接种的样品未被稀释平板计数和 PMA-qPCR 检测到,而 qPCR 检测到的细胞为 8.16log10 细胞/ml。qPCR 和 PMA-qPCR 之间的定量循环(Cq)差异约为 16 个循环,这意味着检测到的死细胞减少了 65536 倍。总之,PMA-qPCR 方法是一种定量活 CPA-2 细胞的合适工具,可用于估计该拮抗剂在橙子表面定殖的能力。