Rankin Bradford L, Buffo Stephanie K, Dean Jesse C
Division of Physical Therapy, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; and.
Division of Physical Therapy, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; and Ralph H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, South Carolina
J Neurophysiol. 2014 Jul 15;112(2):374-83. doi: 10.1152/jn.00138.2014. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
Stability is an important concern during human walking and can limit mobility in clinical populations. Mediolateral stability can be efficiently controlled through appropriate foot placement, although the underlying neuromechanical strategy is unclear. We hypothesized that humans control mediolateral foot placement through swing leg muscle activity, basing this control on the mechanical state of the contralateral stance leg. Participants walked under Unperturbed and Perturbed conditions, in which foot placement was intermittently perturbed by moving the right leg medially or laterally during the swing phase (by ∼50-100 mm). We quantified mediolateral foot placement, electromyographic activity of frontal-plane hip muscles, and stance leg mechanical state. During Unperturbed walking, greater swing-phase gluteus medius (GM) activity was associated with more lateral foot placement. Increases in GM activity were most strongly predicted by increased mediolateral displacement between the center of mass (CoM) and the contralateral stance foot. The Perturbed walking results indicated a causal relationship between stance leg mechanics and swing-phase GM activity. Perturbations that reduced the mediolateral CoM displacement from the stance foot caused reductions in swing-phase GM activity and more medial foot placement. Conversely, increases in mediolateral CoM displacement caused increased swing-phase GM activity and more lateral foot placement. Under both Unperturbed and Perturbed conditions, humans controlled their mediolateral foot placement by modulating swing-phase muscle activity in response to the mechanical state of the contralateral leg. This strategy may be disrupted in clinical populations with a reduced ability to modulate muscle activity or sense their body's mechanical state.
在人类行走过程中,稳定性是一个重要问题,并且可能会限制临床人群的活动能力。尽管潜在的神经力学策略尚不清楚,但通过适当的足部放置可以有效地控制左右方向的稳定性。我们假设人类通过摆动腿的肌肉活动来控制左右方向的足部放置,并基于对侧支撑腿的力学状态进行这种控制。参与者在无干扰和受干扰条件下行走,在受干扰条件下,在摆动阶段通过将右腿向内或向外移动(约50 - 100毫米)间歇性地干扰足部放置。我们量化了左右方向的足部放置、额面髋关节肌肉的肌电图活动以及支撑腿的力学状态。在无干扰行走期间,摆动阶段臀中肌(GM)活动增加与足部更向外放置有关。GM活动的增加最强烈地由重心(CoM)与对侧支撑足之间左右方向位移的增加所预测。受干扰行走的结果表明支撑腿力学与摆动阶段GM活动之间存在因果关系。减少重心相对于支撑足左右方向位移的干扰会导致摆动阶段GM活动减少以及足部更向内放置。相反,重心左右方向位移的增加会导致摆动阶段GM活动增加以及足部更向外放置。在无干扰和受干扰条件下,人类都通过根据对侧腿的力学状态调节摆动阶段的肌肉活动来控制左右方向的足部放置。这种策略在调节肌肉活动或感知身体力学状态能力降低的临床人群中可能会受到干扰。