Zupan Laure, Cabeza Mar, Maiorano Luigi, Roquet Cristina, Devictor Vincent, Lavergne Sébastien, Mouillot David, Mouquet Nicolas, Renaud Julien, Thuiller Wilfried
Laboratoire d'Écologie Alpine, UMR CNRS 5553, Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble Cedex 9, France.
Metapopulation Research Group, Department of Biosciences, P.O. Box 65, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland.
Divers Distrib. 2014 Jun 1;20(6):674-685. doi: 10.1111/ddi.12186.
We investigate patterns of phylogenetic diversity in relation to species diversity for European birds, mammals and amphibians, to evaluate their congruence and highlight areas of particular evolutionary history. We estimate the extent to which the European network of protected areas (PAs) network retains interesting evolutionary history areas for the three groups separately and simultaneously.
Europe.
Phylogenetic (QE) and species diversity (SD) were estimated using the Rao's quadratic entropy at 10' resolution. We determined the regional relationship between QE and SD for each taxa with a spatial regression model and used the tails of the residuals (QE) distribution to identify areas of higher and lower QE than predicted. Spatial congruence of biodiversity between groups was assessed with Pearson's correlation. A simple classification scheme allowed building a convergence map where a convergent pixel equalled to a QE value of the same sign for the 3 groups. This convergence map was overlaid to the current PAs network to estimate the level of protection in convergent pixels and compared it to a null expectation built on 1000 randomization of PAs over the landscape.
QE patterns across vertebrates show a strong spatial mismatch highlighting different evolutionary histories. Convergent areas represent only 2.7% of the Western Palearctic, with only 8.4% of these areas being covered by the current PAs network while a random distribution would retain 10.4% of them. QE are unequally represented within PAs: areas with higher QE than predicted are better covered than expected, while low QE areas are undersampled.
Patterns of diversity strongly diverge between groups of vertebrates in Europe. Although Europe has the world's most extensive PAs network, evolutionary history of terrestrial vertebrates is unequally protected. The challenge is now to reconcile effective conservation planning with a contemporary view of biodiversity integrating multiple facets.
我们研究欧洲鸟类、哺乳动物和两栖动物的系统发育多样性与物种多样性的模式,以评估它们的一致性,并突出具有特殊进化历史的区域。我们分别并同时估计了欧洲保护区网络对这三类动物保留有趣进化历史区域的程度。
欧洲。
使用分辨率为10'的Rao二次熵估计系统发育(QE)和物种多样性(SD)。我们用空间回归模型确定每个分类单元的QE和SD之间的区域关系,并利用残差(QE)分布的尾部来识别高于或低于预测值的QE区域。用Pearson相关性评估不同类群之间生物多样性的空间一致性。一个简单的分类方案允许构建一个收敛图,其中一个收敛像素等于这三类动物具有相同符号的QE值。这个收敛图与当前的保护区网络叠加,以估计收敛像素中的保护水平,并将其与基于景观上1000次随机化的保护区的零期望进行比较。
脊椎动物的QE模式显示出强烈的空间不匹配,突出了不同的进化历史。收敛区域仅占西古北区的2.7%,其中只有8.4%的区域被当前的保护区网络覆盖,而随机分布将保留10.4%的区域。QE在保护区内的代表性不均衡:高于预测值的QE区域的覆盖情况比预期更好,而低QE区域的采样不足。
欧洲脊椎动物类群之间的多样性模式差异很大。尽管欧洲拥有世界上最广泛的保护区网络,但陆地脊椎动物的进化历史受到的保护并不均衡。现在的挑战是将有效的保护规划与整合多个方面的当代生物多样性观点相协调。