Psychiatric Section, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Italy.
Compr Psychiatry. 2014 Jul;55(5):1234-43. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.03.018. Epub 2014 Mar 29.
In the present study we sought: 1) to estimate the frequency of substance use disorders (SUD), and 2) to investigate whether there is a mere association between diagnosis and SUD in a large cohort of patients with severe psychiatric disorders representative of the usual setting and modality of care of a psychiatric emergency service in a geographically well-defined catchment area in Italy, independent of sociodemographic features, anamnestic data and clinical status. The study was conducted between January 2007 and December 2008. The following rating scales were performed: the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S), the Global Assessment of Functioning scale (GAF) and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Factors found to be associated (p<0.05) with SUD[+] in the univariate analyses were subjected to multilevel logistic regression model with a backward stepwise procedure. Among 848 inpatients of our sample 29.1% had a SUD codiagnosis. Eleven factors accounted for 30.6% of the variability in SUD[+]: [a] a Personality Disorder diagnosis, [b] a Depressive Disorder diagnosis, [c] male gender, [d] previous outpatient contacts, [e] single marital status, [f] no previous psychiatric treatments, [g] younger age, [h] lower scores for BPRS Anxiety-depression and [i] BPRS Thought Disturbance, [l] higher scores for BPRS Activation and [m] BPRS Hostile-suspiciousness. The findings are important in identifying (1) the complexity of the clinical presentation of SUD in a inpatients sample, (2) the need for collaboration among health care workers, and (3) the need to develop and apply treatment programs that are targeted at particular risk groups.
在本研究中,我们寻求:1)估计物质使用障碍(SUD)的频率,以及 2)在一个代表意大利一个地理定义明确的地区的精神科急诊服务的常规设置和护理模式的大量严重精神障碍患者中,调查是否存在单纯的诊断与 SUD 之间的关联,独立于社会人口统计学特征、病史数据和临床状况。该研究于 2007 年 1 月至 2008 年 12 月进行。进行了以下评分量表:临床总体印象严重度量表(CGI-S)、总体功能评估量表(GAF)和简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)。在单因素分析中发现与 SUD[+]相关的因素(p<0.05)被纳入具有逐步后退程序的多级逻辑回归模型。在我们样本的 848 名住院患者中,29.1%有 SUD 共病诊断。有 11 个因素占 SUD[+]的 30.6%的可变性:[a]人格障碍诊断,[b]抑郁障碍诊断,[c]男性性别,[d]以前的门诊接触,[e]单身婚姻状况,[f]没有以前的精神科治疗,[g]年龄较小,[h]BPRS 焦虑抑郁和[i]BPRS 思维障碍评分较低,[l]BPRS 激活评分较高,[m]BPRS 敌对猜疑评分较高。这些发现对于确定以下方面很重要:1)住院患者样本中 SUD 临床表现的复杂性,2)医疗保健工作者之间合作的必要性,以及 3)需要制定和应用针对特定风险群体的治疗方案。