Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232-2561, USA.
Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232-2561, USA.
Hum Pathol. 2014 Jul;45(7):1445-50. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2014.02.020. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
We investigated the role of leukocyte chemotactic factor (LECT2) immunohistochemical staining in the diagnosis of type of renal amyloidosis. Fifty renal amyloidosis cases with available paraffin blocks in our 2002 to 2012 renal biopsy files were reviewed. Patients were designated as a defined amyloid, including amyloid light chain (AL) and amyloid-associated amyloid (AA), or a non-AL/non-AA amyloid group. LECT2-specific antibody immunohistochemistry was performed in all 50 cases. Laser microdissection and mass spectrometry (LMD/MS) were performed in 10 cases. Forty-five patients had amyloid classified as either AL (44) or AA (1), and 5 had undetermined amyloid. Three of the five non-AL/non-AA group patient biopsies showed positive LECT2 immunohistochemical staining, and of these, LECT2 was also identified by LMD/MS in 1 patient, fibrinogen-α was identified in 1 patient, and apolipoprotein IV was identified in 1 patient. Two of these non-AL/non-AA patients showed negative LECT2 staining, and LMD/MS showed apolipoprotein IV as a major protein component. Five of the 44 AL amyloid patients showed weakly positive LECT2 staining. However, LECT2 was not identified by LMD/MS in any of these 5 cases. The single patient with AA amyloid was negative for LECT2 by immunohistochemical staining. Among 5 non-AL and non-AA amyloidosis patients in our study, 1 had LECT2, 1 had fibrinogen-α, and 3 had apolipoprotein IV as a major protein component. The data from this study show that weak LECT2 staining should be regarded as indeterminate or a negative result and does not per se allow diagnosis of specific amyloid type. The diagnosis of LECT2 renal amyloidosis may require LMD/MS confirmation.
我们研究了白细胞趋化因子(LECT2)免疫组化染色在诊断肾淀粉样变性类型中的作用。在我们 2002 年至 2012 年的肾活检文件中,回顾了 50 例有可用石蜡块的肾淀粉样变性病例。患者被指定为明确的淀粉样变性,包括淀粉样轻链(AL)和淀粉样相关淀粉样变性(AA)或非 AL/非 AA 淀粉样变性组。对所有 50 例进行了 LECT2 特异性抗体免疫组化染色。对 10 例进行了激光显微切割和质谱(LMD/MS)分析。45 例患者的淀粉样变性分为 AL(44 例)或 AA(1 例),5 例患者的淀粉样变性不确定。在 5 例非 AL/非 AA 组患者的活检中,有 3 例显示 LECT2 免疫组化染色阳性,其中 1 例通过 LMD/MS 鉴定为 LECT2,1 例鉴定为纤维蛋白原-α,1 例鉴定为载脂蛋白 IV。这 2 例非 AL/非 AA 患者的 LECT2 染色均为阴性,LMD/MS 显示载脂蛋白 IV 为主要蛋白成分。44 例 AL 淀粉样变性患者中有 5 例显示弱阳性 LECT2 染色。然而,在这 5 例中,通过 LMD/MS 均未鉴定出 LECT2。唯一的 AA 淀粉样变性患者的 LECT2 免疫组化染色为阴性。在我们的研究中,5 例非 AL 和非 AA 淀粉样变性患者中,1 例有 LECT2,1 例有纤维蛋白原-α,3 例有载脂蛋白 IV 为主要蛋白成分。本研究的数据表明,弱 LECT2 染色应视为不确定或阴性结果,本身并不能诊断特定的淀粉样变性类型。LECT2 肾淀粉样变性的诊断可能需要 LMD/MS 确认。