Section of Geriatric and Medicine, Careggi Teaching Hospital, Via delle Oblate 4, 50141 Florence, Italy.
Obesity Agency, Careggi Teaching Hospital, Via delle Oblate 4, 50141 Florence, Italy; Diabetes Agency, Careggi Teaching Hospital, Via delle Oblate 4, 50141 Florence, Italy.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2014 Jul;24(7):689-97. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2014.01.017. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Recently, the SAVOR TIMI-53 (Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in patients with diabetes mellitus--Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction-53) reported a significant increase in the risk of hospitalizations for heart failure in patients treated with saxagliptin in comparison with placebo. Aim of the present meta-analysis is the systematic collection and synthesis of information on treatment-emergent cases of acute heart failure described in randomized clinical trials with DPP4.
An extensive Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Database search for "vildagliptin", "sitagliptin", "saxagliptin", "alogliptin", "linagliptin", and "dutogliptin" was performed, collecting all randomized clinical trials on humans up to October 1st, 2013. Studies were included if they satisfied the following criteria: i) randomized trials, ii) duration ≥24 weeks; iii) on type 2 diabetes; iv) comparison of DPP4i with placebo or active drugs. The principal outcome was the effect of DPP4i on the incidence of acute heart failure. A total of 84 eligible trials was identified. The overall risk of acute heart failure was higher in patients treated with DPP4i in comparison with those treated with placebo/active comparators (MH-OR: 1.19[1.03; 1.37]; p = 0.015). When trials with non-cardiovascular outcomes were analysed separately no signal of risk was detectable.
Available data from RCTs suggest that DPP4i could be associated with an increased risk of heart failure, without any clear evidence of differences among drugs of the class. Although it is plausible that the risk is greater in some sub-populations of patients, current evidence is not yet sufficient to identify susceptible patients.
最近,SAVOR TIMI-53(沙格列汀评估糖尿病患者血管结局记录——心肌梗死溶栓治疗 53)研究报告称,与安慰剂相比,沙格列汀治疗患者因心力衰竭住院的风险显著增加。本荟萃分析的目的是系统收集和综合分析 DPP4 随机临床试验中描述的治疗中出现的急性心力衰竭病例的信息。
广泛检索 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库,搜索“维格列汀”、“西格列汀”、“沙格列汀”、“阿格列汀”、“利格列汀”和“度格列汀”,收集截至 2013 年 10 月 1 日所有针对人类的随机临床试验。如果研究符合以下标准,则将其纳入:i)随机试验,ii)持续时间≥24 周;iii)针对 2 型糖尿病;iv)DPP4i 与安慰剂或活性药物比较。主要结局是 DPP4i 对急性心力衰竭发生率的影响。共确定了 84 项符合条件的试验。与安慰剂/活性对照相比,DPP4i 治疗患者的急性心力衰竭风险更高(MH-OR:1.19[1.03;1.37];p = 0.015)。当单独分析不包括心血管结局的试验时,未检测到风险信号。
来自 RCT 的现有数据表明,DPP4i 可能与心力衰竭风险增加相关,但在该类药物中没有任何明确的差异证据。虽然在某些患者亚群中风险可能更高,但目前的证据还不足以确定易感患者。