• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2001-2008 年新南威尔士州胃食管交界癌手术后的生存、死亡率和发病率结果。

Survival, mortality and morbidity outcomes after oesophagogastric cancer surgery in New South Wales, 2001-2008.

机构信息

Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Cancer Institute NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2014 Apr 21;200(7):408-13. doi: 10.5694/mja13.11182.

DOI:10.5694/mja13.11182
PMID:24794674
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the relationship between hospital volume and patient outcomes for New South Wales hospitals performing oesophagectomy and gastrectomy for oesophagogastric cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: A retrospective, population-based cohort study of NSW residents diagnosed with a new case of invasive oesophageal or gastric cancer who underwent oesophagectomy or gastrectomy between 2001 and 2008 in NSW hospitals using linked de-identified data from the NSW Central Cancer Registry, the National Death Index and the NSW Admitted Patient Data Collection. A higher-volume hospital was defined as one performing > 6 relevant procedures per year.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Odds ratios for > 21-day length of stay, 28-day unplanned readmission, 30-day mortality and 90-day mortality, and hazard ratios (HRs) for 5-year absolute and conditional survival.

RESULTS

Oesophagectomy (908 patients) and gastrectomy (1621 patients) were undertaken in 42 and 84 hospitals, respectively, between 2001 and 2008. Median annual hospital volume ranged from 2 to 4 for oesophagectomies and ranged from 2 to 3 for gastrectomies. Controlling for known confounders, no associations between hospital volume and > 21-day length of stay and 28-day unplanned readmission were found. Overall 30-day mortality was 4.1% and 4.4% for oesophagectomy and gastrectomy, respectively. Five-year absolute survival was significantly better for patients who underwent oesophagectomy in higher-volume hospitals (adjusted HR for lower-volume hospitals, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.10-1.49]; P = 0.002) and for those with localised gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy in higher-volume hospitals (adjusted HR for lower-volume hospitals, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.28-2.61]; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These data support initial surgery for oesophagogastric cancer in higher-volume hospitals.

摘要

目的

研究新南威尔士州(NSW)施行食管癌和胃癌切除术的医院的容量与患者结局之间的关系。

设计、地点和患者:这是一项基于人群的 NSW 居民回顾性队列研究,纳入 2001 年至 2008 年期间在 NSW 医院接受食管癌或胃癌切除术的患者,使用 NSW 中央癌症登记处、国家死亡索引和 NSW 入院患者数据采集处的去标识化数据进行链接。高容量医院定义为每年施行>6 例相关手术的医院。

主要结局测量指标

21 天以上住院时间、28 天非计划性再入院、30 天死亡率和 90 天死亡率的比值比(ORs),以及 5 年绝对和条件生存率的风险比(HRs)。

结果

2001 年至 2008 年间,42 家医院施行食管癌切除术(908 例患者),84 家医院施行胃癌切除术(1621 例患者)。每年医院的中位数手术量范围为 2 至 4 例食管癌切除术,2 至 3 例胃癌切除术。在控制已知混杂因素后,未发现医院容量与 21 天以上住院时间和 28 天非计划性再入院之间存在关联。食管癌和胃癌切除术的 30 天总死亡率分别为 4.1%和 4.4%。在高容量医院接受手术的患者,5 年绝对生存率显著提高(低容量医院的校正 HR,1.28 [95%CI,1.10-1.49];P = 0.002),且在高容量医院接受局部胃癌切除术的患者,5 年绝对生存率也显著提高(低容量医院的校正 HR,1.83 [95%CI,1.28-2.61];P = 0.001)。

结论

这些数据支持在高容量医院进行食管癌和胃癌的初始手术。

相似文献

1
Survival, mortality and morbidity outcomes after oesophagogastric cancer surgery in New South Wales, 2001-2008.2001-2008 年新南威尔士州胃食管交界癌手术后的生存、死亡率和发病率结果。
Med J Aust. 2014 Apr 21;200(7):408-13. doi: 10.5694/mja13.11182.
2
Effect of hospital volume on postoperative mortality and survival after oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2009.1989 年至 2009 年荷兰医院容量对食管和胃癌手术后术后死亡率和生存率的影响。
Eur J Cancer. 2012 May;48(7):1004-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.02.064. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
3
Differences in outcomes of oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery across Europe.欧洲各地食管癌和胃癌手术结果的差异。
Br J Surg. 2013 Jan;100(1):83-94. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8966. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
4
Influence of hospital type on outcomes after oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery.医院类型对食管癌和胃癌手术后结局的影响。
Br J Surg. 2012 Jul;99(7):954-63. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8787. Epub 2012 May 9.
5
Surgical outcomes associated with oesophagectomy in New South Wales: an investigation of hospital volume.新南威尔士州食管切除术的手术结果:对医院容量的调查。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Jun;14(6):951-7. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1198-7. Epub 2010 Apr 23.
6
Survival, mortality and morbidity outcomes after oesophagogastric cancer surgery in New South Wales, 2001-2008.
Med J Aust. 2014 Oct 20;201(8):447. doi: 10.5694/mja14.00975.
7
Survival, mortality and morbidity outcomes after oesophagogastric cancer surgery in New South Wales, 2001-2008.
Med J Aust. 2014 Oct 20;201(8):447. doi: 10.5694/mja14.00870.
8
Using textbook outcome as a measure of quality of care in oesophagogastric cancer surgery.使用教科书结局作为食管胃交界癌手术质量的衡量标准。
Br J Surg. 2018 Apr;105(5):561-569. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10729. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
9
Oesophagectomy rates and post-resection outcomes in patients with cancer of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction: a population-based study using linked health administrative linked data.食管和胃食管交界处癌症患者的食管切除术率和术后结果:使用基于人群的健康管理关联数据进行的研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Nov 8;12:384. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-384.
10
Hospital volume, proportion resected and mortality from oesophageal and gastric cancer: a population-based study in England, 2004-2008.医院容量、切除比例和英格兰 2004-2008 年食管癌和胃癌死亡率:一项基于人群的研究。
Gut. 2013 Jul;62(7):961-6. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303008. Epub 2012 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal Hospital Volume to Minimize Postoperative Mortality After Esophagectomy for Cancer in Low Population Density Countries: A Binational Study of Australia and New Zealand.低人口密度国家食管癌切除术后降低死亡率的最佳医院手术量:澳大利亚和新西兰的双边研究
World J Surg. 2025 Jun;49(6):1537-1545. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12595. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
2
An Australian regional hospital's oesophagectomy experience: A 10-year case series from Tasmania.一家澳大利亚地区医院的食管切除术经验:来自塔斯马尼亚的10年病例系列。
Surg Pract Sci. 2025 Mar 17;21:100279. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2025.100279. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Association between volume and cost in low-resection volume regions: a population-level study on pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer patients.
低切除量区域中手术量与成本之间的关联:一项针对胰腺癌患者胰十二指肠切除术的人群水平研究
ANZ J Surg. 2025 Mar;95(3):377-385. doi: 10.1111/ans.19273. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
4
Best Practices for Managing Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer in Canada.加拿大不可切除转移性胃和胃食管交界处癌患者管理的最佳实践。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Apr 30;31(5):2552-2565. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31050191.
5
Nanomaterials in tumor immunotherapy: new strategies and challenges.肿瘤免疫治疗中的纳米材料:新策略和挑战。
Mol Cancer. 2023 Jun 13;22(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12943-023-01797-9.
6
Understanding Potentially Preventable Mortality Following Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Surgery: Analysis of a National Audit of Surgical Mortality.了解胃食管交界癌手术后的潜在可预防死亡率:对全国手术死亡率审计的分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Aug;30(8):4950-4961. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13571-8. Epub 2023 May 8.
7
Association of hospital volume and long-term survival after esophagectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.食管癌切除术后医院手术量与长期生存的关联:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2023 Apr 21;10:1161938. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1161938. eCollection 2023.
8
The SYMPTOM-upper gastrointestinal study: A mixed methods study exploring symptom appraisal and help-seeking in Australian upper gastrointestinal cancer patients.症状-上消化道研究:一项探索澳大利亚上消化道癌症患者症状评估与求助行为的混合方法研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Sep;31(5):e13605. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13605. Epub 2022 May 6.
9
Diabetes Adversely Influences Postoperative Outcomes After Oesophagectomy: An Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.糖尿病对食管癌切除术后的术后结局产生不利影响:一项基于国家外科质量改进计划数据库的分析。
Cureus. 2022 Jan 24;14(1):e21559. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21559. eCollection 2022 Jan.
10
Timeliness of cancer care in a regional Victorian health service: A comparison of high-volume (Lung) and low-volume (oesophagogastric) tumour streams.维多利亚州区域性卫生服务机构中癌症治疗的及时性:高容量(肺部)和低容量(食管胃)肿瘤患者的比较。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2021 Feb;4(1):e1301. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1301. Epub 2020 Oct 7.