Soulakova Julia N, Crockett Lisa J
Department of Statistics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USA.
J Addict Behav Ther Rehabil. 2014 Jan 2;3(1):1000113. doi: 10.4172/2324-9005.1000114.
The study examined consistency of reports concerning current and prior smoking behaviors. Data came from the 2002-2003 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey, where the current smoking behaviors and smoking history were reported by self- and proxy-respondents on two occasions, one year apart. The ever-smoking status is reported consistently, overall: Kappa coefficient is 0.78 with the corresponding 95% confidence interval given by (0.77, 0.78). One specific type of inconsistency of prior reports was assessed for respondents who were identified as never smokers at the latter assessment and former or current smokers at the earlier assessment. Based on the survey logistic regression that controls for multiple respondent characteristics and survey administration method, the estimated prevalence of such inconsistent self-reports is 9.0%, and prevalence of inconsistent proxy-reports is 5.4%. In addition, prevalence of recanting, i.e., future reporting never smoking for respondents who previously claimed to be a former or a current smoker was assessed. The recanting was shown to be most prevalent with respect to proxy-reports and former smokers: overall prevalence of recanting was estimated to be in the range 13% - 19% for current smokers, and 27% - 46% for former smokers. Our findings indicate that while, unexpectedly, proxy-respondents are more likely to report the ever-smoking status consistently than do self-respondents, the proxies are also more likely to incorrectly report never smoking in the future for smokers especially regarding adolescents and young adults. Therefore, the observed higher level of consistency for proxy-respondents may be due to proxies' incorrect knowledge which leads to consistent yet ambiguous responses.
该研究考察了有关当前及既往吸烟行为报告的一致性。数据来源于2002 - 2003年《当前人口调查烟草使用补充调查》,其中当前吸烟行为和吸烟史由自我受访者和代理受访者分两次报告,时间间隔为一年。总体而言,曾经吸烟状况的报告具有一致性:卡帕系数为0.78,相应的95%置信区间为(0.77, 0.78)。对于那些在后期评估中被认定为从不吸烟者而在早期评估中为曾经吸烟者或当前吸烟者的受访者,评估了既往报告的一种特定不一致类型。基于控制多个受访者特征和调查管理方法的调查逻辑回归分析,此类不一致自我报告的估计患病率为9.0%,不一致代理报告的患病率为5.4%。此外,还评估了反悔情况,即对于之前声称是曾经吸烟者或当前吸烟者的受访者,未来报告从不吸烟的情况。结果显示,反悔情况在代理报告和曾经吸烟者中最为普遍:当前吸烟者的反悔总体患病率估计在13% - 19%之间,曾经吸烟者的反悔总体患病率在27% - 46%之间。我们的数据表明,虽然出乎意料的是,代理受访者比自我受访者更有可能一致地报告曾经吸烟状况,但代理受访者也更有可能错误地报告吸烟者未来从不吸烟,尤其是对于青少年和年轻人。因此,观察到的代理受访者较高的一致性水平可能是由于代理受访者的错误认知导致一致但模糊的回答。