Suppr超能文献

自我报告和代理报告的曾经吸烟状况相隔一年的一致性及撤回情况。

Consistency and Recanting of Ever-Smoking Status Reported by Self and Proxy Respondents One Year Apart.

作者信息

Soulakova Julia N, Crockett Lisa J

机构信息

Department of Statistics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USA.

出版信息

J Addict Behav Ther Rehabil. 2014 Jan 2;3(1):1000113. doi: 10.4172/2324-9005.1000114.

Abstract

The study examined consistency of reports concerning current and prior smoking behaviors. Data came from the 2002-2003 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey, where the current smoking behaviors and smoking history were reported by self- and proxy-respondents on two occasions, one year apart. The ever-smoking status is reported consistently, overall: Kappa coefficient is 0.78 with the corresponding 95% confidence interval given by (0.77, 0.78). One specific type of inconsistency of prior reports was assessed for respondents who were identified as never smokers at the latter assessment and former or current smokers at the earlier assessment. Based on the survey logistic regression that controls for multiple respondent characteristics and survey administration method, the estimated prevalence of such inconsistent self-reports is 9.0%, and prevalence of inconsistent proxy-reports is 5.4%. In addition, prevalence of recanting, i.e., future reporting never smoking for respondents who previously claimed to be a former or a current smoker was assessed. The recanting was shown to be most prevalent with respect to proxy-reports and former smokers: overall prevalence of recanting was estimated to be in the range 13% - 19% for current smokers, and 27% - 46% for former smokers. Our findings indicate that while, unexpectedly, proxy-respondents are more likely to report the ever-smoking status consistently than do self-respondents, the proxies are also more likely to incorrectly report never smoking in the future for smokers especially regarding adolescents and young adults. Therefore, the observed higher level of consistency for proxy-respondents may be due to proxies' incorrect knowledge which leads to consistent yet ambiguous responses.

摘要

该研究考察了有关当前及既往吸烟行为报告的一致性。数据来源于2002 - 2003年《当前人口调查烟草使用补充调查》,其中当前吸烟行为和吸烟史由自我受访者和代理受访者分两次报告,时间间隔为一年。总体而言,曾经吸烟状况的报告具有一致性:卡帕系数为0.78,相应的95%置信区间为(0.77, 0.78)。对于那些在后期评估中被认定为从不吸烟者而在早期评估中为曾经吸烟者或当前吸烟者的受访者,评估了既往报告的一种特定不一致类型。基于控制多个受访者特征和调查管理方法的调查逻辑回归分析,此类不一致自我报告的估计患病率为9.0%,不一致代理报告的患病率为5.4%。此外,还评估了反悔情况,即对于之前声称是曾经吸烟者或当前吸烟者的受访者,未来报告从不吸烟的情况。结果显示,反悔情况在代理报告和曾经吸烟者中最为普遍:当前吸烟者的反悔总体患病率估计在13% - 19%之间,曾经吸烟者的反悔总体患病率在27% - 46%之间。我们的数据表明,虽然出乎意料的是,代理受访者比自我受访者更有可能一致地报告曾经吸烟状况,但代理受访者也更有可能错误地报告吸烟者未来从不吸烟,尤其是对于青少年和年轻人。因此,观察到的代理受访者较高的一致性水平可能是由于代理受访者的错误认知导致一致但模糊的回答。

相似文献

1
Consistency and Recanting of Ever-Smoking Status Reported by Self and Proxy Respondents One Year Apart.
J Addict Behav Ther Rehabil. 2014 Jan 2;3(1):1000113. doi: 10.4172/2324-9005.1000114.
3
Effect of proxy-reported smoking status on population estimates of smoking prevalence.
Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Apr 15;145(8):746-51. doi: 10.1093/aje/145.8.746.
4
Consistency of self-reported smoking over a 6-year interval from adolescence to young adulthood.
Addiction. 2007 Nov;102(11):1831-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01974.x. Epub 2007 Sep 3.
5
Smoking and visual impairment among older adults with age-related eye diseases.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2011 Jul;8(4):A84. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
7
Age of smoking milestones: longitudinal inconsistencies and recanting.
J Adolesc Health. 2015 Apr;56(4):382-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.12.005. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
9
Response consistency in young adolescents' drug use self-reports: a recanting rate analysis.
Addiction. 2005 Feb;100(2):189-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00943.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Vaping: The emerging epidemic and its psychiatric implications in India.
Ind Psychiatry J. 2025 Jan-Apr;34(1):1-3. doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_465_24. Epub 2025 Apr 18.
2
Cell-free DNA methylation-defined prognostic subgroups in small-cell lung cancer identified by leukocyte methylation subtraction.
iScience. 2022 Nov 4;25(12):105487. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105487. eCollection 2022 Dec 22.
3
Design-based single-mediator approach for complex survey data.
Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2021;50(3):822-831. doi: 10.1080/03610918.2019.1568472. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
4
Alternative Tobacco Product Use in Critically Ill Patients.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 24;17(23):8707. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238707.
8
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Consistent Reporting of Smoking-Related Behaviors.
J Addict Behav Ther Rehabil. 2015;4(4). doi: 10.4172/2324-9005.1000147. Epub 2015 Nov 29.
9
Progression to Traditional Cigarette Smoking After Electronic Cigarette Use Among US Adolescents and Young Adults.
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Nov;169(11):1018-23. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1742.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability of the high school Youth Risk Behavior Survey when administered online.
Int Q Community Health Educ. 2011;32(2):135-48. doi: 10.2190/IQ.32.2.d.
3
Development and reliability of the lifetime interview on smoking trajectories.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2012 Mar;14(3):290-8. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntr212. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
5
Reliability of adult retrospective recall of lifetime tobacco use.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2008 Feb;10(2):287-99. doi: 10.1080/14622200701825718.
6
Consistency of self-reported smoking over a 6-year interval from adolescence to young adulthood.
Addiction. 2007 Nov;102(11):1831-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01974.x. Epub 2007 Sep 3.
7
Correspondence between proxy and self-reports on smoking in a full family study.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006 Sep 1;84(1):40-7. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.11.026. Epub 2005 Dec 28.
8
Reliability of self-reported smoking history and age at initial tobacco use.
Prev Med. 2005 Aug;41(2):646-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.01.011.
9
Smoke or fog? The usefulness of retrospectively reported information about smoking.
Addiction. 2003 Sep;98(9):1307-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00445.x.
10
Improving the self reporting of tobacco use: results of a factorial experiment.
Tob Control. 2003 Jun;12(2):178-83. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.2.178.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验