Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 24;17(23):8707. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238707.
Alternative tobacco product (ATP) use has bee linked to critical illness, however, few studies have examined the use of these substances in critically ill populations. We sought to examine ATP use within critically ill patients and to define barriers in accurately assessing use within this population. We prospectively studied 533 consecutive patients from the Early Assessment of Renal and Lung Injury study, enrolled between 2013 and 2016 at a tertiary referral center and a safety-net hospital. ATP use information (electronic cigarettes, cigars, pipes, hookahs/waterpipes, and snus/chewing tobacco) was obtained from the patient or surrogate using a detailed survey. Reasons for non-completion of the survey were recorded, and differences between survey responders vs. non-responders, self- vs. surrogate responders, and ATP users vs. non-users were explored. Overall, 80% ( = 425) of subjects (56% male) completed a tobacco product use survey. Of these, 12.2% ( = 52) reported current ATP use, while 5.6% reported using multiple ATP products. When restricted to subjects who were self-responders, 17% reported ATP use, while 10% reported current cigarette smoking alone. The mean age of ATP users was 57 ± 17 years. Those who did not complete a survey were sicker and more likely to have died during admission. Subjects who completed the survey as self-responders reported higher levels of ATP use than ones with surrogate responders ( < 0.0001). ATP use is common among critically ill patients despite them being generally older than traditional users. Survey self-responders were more likely than surrogate responders to report use. These findings highlight the importance of improving our current methods of surveillance of ATP use in older adults in the outpatient setting.
替代烟草产品(ATP)的使用与重病有关,然而,很少有研究调查这些物质在重症患者中的使用情况。我们试图研究重症患者中 ATP 的使用情况,并确定在该人群中准确评估使用情况的障碍。
我们前瞻性地研究了 2013 年至 2016 年期间在一家三级转诊中心和一家安全网医院入组的 533 例连续患者,使用详细的调查获得 ATP 使用信息(电子烟、雪茄、烟斗、水烟/水烟管和鼻烟/咀嚼烟草)。记录未完成调查的原因,并探讨调查应答者与非应答者、自我应答者与替代应答者、ATP 用户与非用户之间的差异。
总体而言,80%(=425)的受试者(56%为男性)完成了一项烟草产品使用调查。其中,12.2%(=52)报告当前使用 ATP,而 5.6%报告同时使用多种 ATP 产品。当仅限于自我应答者时,17%报告使用 ATP,而 10%报告单独使用当前香烟。ATP 用户的平均年龄为 57±17 岁。未完成调查的患者病情更严重,住院期间更有可能死亡。作为自我应答者完成调查的受试者报告的 ATP 使用水平高于替代应答者(<0.0001)。
尽管重症患者通常比传统使用者年龄更大,但他们仍然普遍使用 ATP。作为自我应答者完成调查的受试者比替代应答者更有可能报告使用情况。这些发现强调了在门诊环境中改进我们目前监测老年人 ATP 使用情况的方法的重要性。