Sykioti Panagiota, Zis Panagiotis, Vadalouca Athina, Siafaka Ioanna, Argyra Eriphili, Bouhassira Didier, Stavropoulou Evmorfia, Karandreas Nikolaos
1st Anaesthesiology Clinic, Pain Relief and Palliative Care Unit, Aretaieion University Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Department of Neurology, Evangelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Pain Pract. 2015 Sep;15(7):627-32. doi: 10.1111/papr.12221. Epub 2014 May 5.
BACKGROUND: The Douleur Neuropathique 4 questionnaire (DN4) was developed by the French Neuropathic Pain Group and is a simple and objective tool, primarily designed to screen for neuropathic pain. The aim of our study is to validate the DN4 in the Greek language. METHODS: The study was set up as a prospective observational study. Two pain specialists independently examined patients and diagnosed them with neuropathic, nociceptive, or mixed pain, according to the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) definitions. A third and a fourth physician administered the DN4 questionnaire to the patients. RESULTS: Out of the 237 patients who met our inclusion criteria and had identical diagnoses regarding the type of pain, 123 were diagnosed with neuropathic, 59 with nociceptive, and 55 with mixed pain. Among patients with identical diagnoses of neuropathic or nociceptive pain, using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.92. A cutoff point of equal or greater than 4 resulted in a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 78%. Among patients suffering from pain with neuropathic element (neuropathic or mixed pain) or pain with no neuropathic element (nociceptive pain), using a ROC curve analysis, the AUC was 0.89. A cutoff point of equal or greater than 4 resulted in a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 78%. CONCLUSION: The Greek version of DN4 is a valid tool for discriminating between neuropathic and nociceptive pain conditions in daily practice.
背景:神经病理性疼痛问卷4(DN4)由法国神经病理性疼痛小组编制,是一种简单客观的工具,主要用于筛查神经病理性疼痛。本研究的目的是验证希腊语版的DN4。 方法:本研究为前瞻性观察性研究。两名疼痛专家根据国际疼痛研究协会(IASP)的定义,对患者进行独立检查,并诊断为神经病理性、伤害性或混合性疼痛。第三名和第四名医生向患者发放DN4问卷。 结果:在符合纳入标准且对疼痛类型诊断一致的237例患者中,123例被诊断为神经病理性疼痛,59例为伤害性疼痛,55例为混合性疼痛。在神经病理性或伤害性疼痛诊断相同的患者中,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.92。截断点大于或等于4时,灵敏度为93%,特异度为78%。在患有伴有神经病理性成分的疼痛(神经病理性或混合性疼痛)或不伴有神经病理性成分的疼痛(伤害性疼痛)的患者中,采用ROC曲线分析,AUC为0.89。截断点大于或等于4时,灵敏度为89%,特异度为78%。 结论:希腊语版的DN4是在日常实践中区分神经病理性疼痛和伤害性疼痛的有效工具。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2019-8
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022-12-29
J Clin Med. 2022-9-22