• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国版DN4诊断问卷在腰椎或腰神经根性疼痛患者神经性疼痛中的效度验证。

Validation of the Korean Version of the DN4 Diagnostic Questionnaire for Neuropathic Pain in Patients with Lumbar or Lumbar-Radicular Pain.

作者信息

Kim Ho Joong, Park Joon Hee, Bouhassira Didier, Shin Jae Hoon, Chang Bong Soon, Lee Choon Ki, Baek Chang Hyun, Yeom Jin S

机构信息

Spine Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2016 Mar;57(2):449-54. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.2.449.

DOI:10.3349/ymj.2016.57.2.449
PMID:26847299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4740539/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic value of the Korean version of the Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) questionnaire and to validate this questionnaire in terms of psychometric properties in patients with chronic pain due to degenerative spinal disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Korean version of the DN4 questionnaire, which was translated and linguistically validated by the MAPI Research Group, was tested on 83 patients with lumbar or lumbar-radicular pain. Test-retest reliability was evaluated in a subsample of 40 patients who completed two assessments with an interval of 2 weeks. Nociceptive pain and neuropathic component pain were diagnosed in 40 and 43 patients, respectively.

RESULTS

The Cronbach's α coefficient of internal consistency was 0.819, and the test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient (3, 1) (95% confidence interval) was 0.813 (0.776-0.847) (n=40). The area under the receiver-operator characteristics curve was 0.953 (p<0.001), with 95% confidence interval between 0.869 and 0.990. The Korean version of the DN4 questionnaire showed a sensitivity of 100% and 87.1%, and a specificity of 88.2% and 94.1% at the cutoff value of 3/10 and 4/10, respectively, for discriminating neuropathic component pain.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated the good discriminatory power of DN4 between nociceptive pain and neuropathic component pain in patients with lumbar or lumbar-radicular pain.

摘要

目的

评估韩文版神经病理性疼痛4(DN4)问卷的诊断价值,并验证该问卷在退行性脊柱疾病所致慢性疼痛患者中的心理测量学特性。

材料与方法

由MAPI研究小组翻译并经语言验证的韩文版DN4问卷,在83例腰椎或腰神经根性疼痛患者中进行测试。在40例患者的子样本中评估重测信度,这些患者在间隔2周的时间内完成了两次评估。分别在40例和43例患者中诊断出伤害性疼痛和神经病理性成分疼痛。

结果

内部一致性的Cronbach's α系数为0.819,重测组内相关系数(3,1)(95%置信区间)为0.813(0.776 - 0.847)(n = 40)。受试者操作特征曲线下面积为0.953(p < 0.001),95%置信区间在0.869至0.990之间。韩文版DN4问卷在区分神经病理性成分疼痛时,在截断值为3/10和4/10时,敏感性分别为100%和87.1%,特异性分别为88.2%和94.1%。

结论

本研究证明了DN4在腰椎或腰神经根性疼痛患者的伤害性疼痛和神经病理性成分疼痛之间具有良好的区分能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d23/4740539/a919a6632790/ymj-57-449-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d23/4740539/a919a6632790/ymj-57-449-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d23/4740539/a919a6632790/ymj-57-449-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the Korean Version of the DN4 Diagnostic Questionnaire for Neuropathic Pain in Patients with Lumbar or Lumbar-Radicular Pain.韩国版DN4诊断问卷在腰椎或腰神经根性疼痛患者神经性疼痛中的效度验证。
Yonsei Med J. 2016 Mar;57(2):449-54. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.2.449.
2
Validation of a New Arabic Version of the Neuropathic Pain Diagnostic Questionnaire (DN4).新版阿拉伯语版神经性疼痛诊断问卷(DN4)的验证
Pain Pract. 2017 Jan;17(1):78-87. doi: 10.1111/papr.12419. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
3
Validation of the Greek Version of the DN4 Diagnostic Questionnaire for Neuropathic Pain.用于神经性疼痛的DN4诊断问卷希腊语版本的验证
Pain Pract. 2015 Sep;15(7):627-32. doi: 10.1111/papr.12221. Epub 2014 May 5.
4
Reliability and validity of the Japanese translation of the DN4 Diagnostic Questionnaire in patients with neuropathic pain.DN4诊断问卷日文版在神经性疼痛患者中的信度和效度
J Anesth. 2018 Jun;32(3):403-408. doi: 10.1007/s00540-018-2495-7. Epub 2018 May 5.
5
Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire and Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire-Short Form: Translation, Reliability, and Validation Study of the Turkish Version.神经性疼痛问卷和神经性疼痛问卷简表:土耳其语版本的翻译、信度和效度研究
Turk Neurosurg. 2019;29(5):683-688. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.25466-18.1.
6
Turkish version of the painDETECT questionnaire in the assessment of neuropathic pain: a validity and reliability study.疼痛 DETECT 问卷土耳其语版用于评估神经性疼痛的有效性和可靠性研究。
Pain Med. 2013 Dec;14(12):1933-43. doi: 10.1111/pme.12222. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
7
Translation to Portuguese and validation of the Douleur Neuropathique 4 questionnaire.翻译为葡萄牙语并验证《神经病理性疼痛 4 问卷》。
J Pain. 2010 May;11(5):484-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.09.014. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
8
Adjuvant administration of hypertonic saline in lumbar epidural intervention may be associated with successful response in patients with probable neuropathic radicular pain Screened by Douleur Neuropathique 4.腰椎硬膜外介入时给予高渗盐水辅助治疗,可能与通过 Douleur Neuropathique 4 筛选的疑似神经性根性疼痛患者的成功反应相关。
Int J Med Sci. 2021 May 17;18(12):2736-2742. doi: 10.7150/ijms.59695. eCollection 2021.
9
Validity and reliability of the Arabic adapted version of the DN4 questionnaire (Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions) for differential diagnosis of pain syndromes with a neuropathic or somatic component.阿拉伯语适应版 DN4 问卷(DN4 问卷,即 4 个问题神经性疼痛问卷)用于鉴别诊断具有神经性或躯体性成分的疼痛综合征的有效性和可靠性。
Pain Pract. 2011 Mar-Apr;11(2):139-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2010.00399.x.
10
Nepalese version of Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) questionnaire for detection of neuropathic pain signs and symptoms: Translation and psychometric properties.尼泊尔版的疼痛神经病理性问卷 4(DN4)用于检测神经病理性疼痛的体征和症状:翻译和心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 17;18(7):e0287737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287737. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Shedding light on neuropathic pain: Current and emerging tools for diagnosis, screening, and quantification.揭示神经性疼痛:当前及新兴的诊断、筛查和量化工具
SAGE Open Med. 2024 Feb 9;12:20503121231218985. doi: 10.1177/20503121231218985. eCollection 2024.
2
Nepalese version of Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) questionnaire for detection of neuropathic pain signs and symptoms: Translation and psychometric properties.尼泊尔版的疼痛神经病理性问卷 4(DN4)用于检测神经病理性疼痛的体征和症状:翻译和心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 17;18(7):e0287737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287737. eCollection 2023.
3
Possible Neuropathic Pain in Clinical Practice-Review on Selected Diagnostic Tools and Its Further Challenges.

本文引用的文献

1
Lumbar Stenosis: A Recent Update by Review of Literature.腰椎管狭窄症:文献综述的最新进展
Asian Spine J. 2015 Oct;9(5):818-28. doi: 10.4184/asj.2015.9.5.818. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
2
Low Back Pain: Current Surgical Approaches.腰痛:当前的手术治疗方法
Asian Spine J. 2015 Aug;9(4):645-57. doi: 10.4184/asj.2015.9.4.645. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
3
Therapeutic efficacy of pregabalin in patients with leg symptoms due to lumbar spinal stenosis.普瑞巴林对腰椎管狭窄症所致腿部症状患者的治疗效果。
临床实践中可能存在的神经性疼痛——关于选定诊断工具及其进一步挑战的综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Dec 29;13(1):108. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13010108.
4
Presence of Night Pain, Neuropathic Pain, or Depressive Disorder Does Not Adversely Affect Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study.夜间疼痛、神经性疼痛或抑郁障碍的存在并不影响全膝关节置换术后的结果:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Nov 7;37(43):e309. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e309.
5
Validation of Complete Hindi Version of Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questionnaire for Assessment of Neuropathic Pain.用于评估神经性疼痛的《神经病理性疼痛4问卷》印地语完整版的验证
Indian J Palliat Care. 2021 Apr-Jun;27(2):257-263. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_340_20. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
6
Neuropathic pain in Mali: The current situation, comprehensive hypothesis, which therapeutic strategy for Africa?马里的神经性疼痛:现状、综合假说及非洲的治疗策略是什么?
eNeurologicalSci. 2021 Jan 9;22:100312. doi: 10.1016/j.ensci.2021.100312. eCollection 2021 Mar.
7
Comparison of treatment outcomes in lumbar central stenosis patients treated with epidural steroid injections: interlaminar bilateral transforaminal approach.硬膜外类固醇注射治疗腰椎中央管狭窄症患者的疗效比较:椎板间与双侧经椎间孔入路
Korean J Pain. 2020 Jul 1;33(3):226-233. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2020.33.3.226.
8
Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Study of Chinese OutPatiEnts (PDN-SCOPE): protocol for a multicentre cross-sectional registry study of clinical characteristics and treatment in China.中国门诊糖尿病周围神经病变研究(PDN-SCOPE):中国多中心横断面登记研究临床特征和治疗方案的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 8;9(4):e025722. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025722.
9
Neuropathic cancer pain: prevalence, pathophysiology, and management.神经性癌症疼痛:患病率、病理生理学和管理。
Korean J Intern Med. 2018 Nov;33(6):1058-1069. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2018.162. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
10
Reliability and validity of the Japanese translation of the DN4 Diagnostic Questionnaire in patients with neuropathic pain.DN4诊断问卷日文版在神经性疼痛患者中的信度和效度
J Anesth. 2018 Jun;32(3):403-408. doi: 10.1007/s00540-018-2495-7. Epub 2018 May 5.
Fukushima J Med Sci. 2014;60(1):35-42. doi: 10.5387/fms.2013-22. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
4
Validation of the Greek Version of the DN4 Diagnostic Questionnaire for Neuropathic Pain.用于神经性疼痛的DN4诊断问卷希腊语版本的验证
Pain Pract. 2015 Sep;15(7):627-32. doi: 10.1111/papr.12221. Epub 2014 May 5.
5
The effects of gastroretentive gabapentin (Gralise®) on spinal stenosis patients with radicular pain.胃内滞留型加巴喷丁(Gralise®)对伴有神经根性疼痛的腰椎管狭窄症患者的影响。
Pain Physician. 2014 Mar-Apr;17(2):169-78.
6
What is the evidence that neuropathic pain is present in chronic low back pain and soft tissue syndromes? An evidence-based structured review.有哪些证据表明慢性下背痛和软组织综合征存在神经性疼痛?基于证据的结构化综述。
Pain Med. 2014 Jan;15(1):4-15. doi: 10.1111/pme.12229. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
7
Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Polish version of the Oswestry Disability Index.验证和跨文化适应波兰版的 Oswestry 残疾指数。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Feb 15;38(4):E237-43. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827e948b.
8
Validation of the Dutch version of the DN4 diagnostic questionnaire for neuropathic pain.验证荷兰版 DN4 诊断问卷用于诊断神经性疼痛的有效性。
Pain Pract. 2013 Jun;13(5):390-8. doi: 10.1111/papr.12006. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
9
Efficacy of gabapentin for radiculopathy caused by lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar disk hernia.加巴喷丁治疗腰椎管狭窄症和腰椎间盘突出症所致神经根病的疗效。
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2010;50(12):1070-3. doi: 10.2176/nmc.50.1070.
10
Validity and reliability of the Arabic adapted version of the DN4 questionnaire (Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions) for differential diagnosis of pain syndromes with a neuropathic or somatic component.阿拉伯语适应版 DN4 问卷(DN4 问卷,即 4 个问题神经性疼痛问卷)用于鉴别诊断具有神经性或躯体性成分的疼痛综合征的有效性和可靠性。
Pain Pract. 2011 Mar-Apr;11(2):139-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2010.00399.x.