Eccleston Christopher, Palermo Tonya M, Williams Amanda C de C, Lewandowski Holley Amy, Morley Stephen, Fisher Emma, Law Emily
Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, UK, BA2 7AY.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 5;2014(5):CD003968. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003968.pub4.
This is an update of the original Cochrane review first published in Issue 1, 2003, and previously updated in 2009 and 2012. Chronic pain affects many children, who report severe pain, disability, and distressed mood. Psychological therapies are emerging as effective interventions to treat children with chronic or recurrent pain. This update focuses specifically on psychological therapies delivered face-to-face, adds new randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and additional data from previously included trials.
There were three objectives to this review. First, to determine the effectiveness on clinical outcomes of pain severity, disability, depression, and anxiety of psychological therapy delivered face-to-face for chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents compared with active treatment, waiting-list, or standard medical care. Second, to evaluate the impact of psychological therapies on depression and anxiety, which were previously combined as 'mood'. Third, we assessed the risk of bias of the included studies and the quality of outcomes using the GRADE criteria.
Searches were undertaken of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO. We searched for further RCTs in the references of all identified studies, meta-analyses, and reviews. Trial registry databases were also searched. The date of most recent search was January 2014.
RCTs with at least 10 participants in each arm post-treatment comparing psychological therapies with active treatment, standard medical care, or waiting-list control for children or adolescents with episodic, recurrent or persistent pain were eligible for inclusion. Only trials conducted in person (face-to-face) were considered. Studies that delivered treatment remotely were excluded from this update.
All included studies were analysed and the quality of outcomes were assessed. All treatments were combined into one class, psychological treatments. Pain conditions were split into headache and non-headache. Both conditions were assessed on four outcomes: pain, disability, depression, and anxiety. Data were extracted at two time points; post-treatment (immediately or the earliest data available following end of treatment) and at follow-up (between three and 12 months post-treatment).
Seven papers were identified in the updated search. Of these papers, five presented new trials and two presented follow-up data for previously included trials. Five studies that were previously included in this review were excluded as therapy was delivered remotely. The review thus included a total of 37 studies. The total number of participants completing treatments was 2111. Twenty studies addressed treatments for headache (including migraine); nine for abdominal pain; two for mixed pain conditions including headache pain, two for fibromyalgia, two for recurrent abdominal pain or irritable bowel syndrome, and two for pain associated with sickle cell disease.Analyses revealed psychological therapies to be beneficial for children with chronic pain on seven outcomes. For headache pain, psychological therapies reduced pain post-treatment and at follow-up respectively (risk ratio (RR) 2.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.97 to 3.09, z = 7.87, p < 0.01, number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) = 2.94; RR 2.89, 95% CI 1.03 to 8.07, z = 2.02, p < 0.05, NNTB = 3.67). Psychological therapies also had a small beneficial effect at reducing disability in headache conditions post-treatment and at follow-up respectively (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.49, 95% CI -0.74 to -0.24, z = 3.90, p < 0.01; SMD -0.46, 95% CI -0.78 to -0.13, z = 2.72, p < 0.01). No beneficial effect was found on depression post-treatment (SMD -0.18, 95% CI -0.49 to 0.14, z = 1.11, p > 0.05). At follow-up, only one study was eligible, therefore no analysis was possible and no conclusions can be drawn. Analyses revealed a small beneficial effect for anxiety post-treatment (SMD -0.33, 95% CI -0.61 to -0.04, z = 2.25, p < 0.05). However, this was not maintained at follow-up (SMD -0.28, 95% CI -1.00 to 0.45; z = 0.75, p > 0.05).Analyses revealed two beneficial effects of psychological treatment for children with non-headache pain. Pain was found to improve post-treatment (SMD -0.57, 95% CI -0.86 to -0.27, z = 3.74, p < 0.01), but not at follow-up (SMD -0.11, 95% CI -0.41 to 0.19, z = 0.73, p > 0.05). Psychological therapies also had a beneficial effect for disability post-treatment (SMD -0.45, 95% CI -0.71 to -0.19, z = 3.40, p < 0.01), but this was not maintained at follow-up (SMD -0.35, 95% CI -0.71 to 0.02, z = 1.87, p > 0.05). No effect was found for depression or anxiety post-treatment (SMD -0.07, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.17, z = 0.54, p > 0.05; SMD -0.15, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.07, z = 1.33, p > 0.05) or at follow-up (SMD 0.06, 95% CI -0.16 to 0.28, z = 0.53, p > 0.05; SMD 0.05, 95% CI -0.24 to 0.33, z = 0.32, p > 0.05).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Psychological treatments delivered face-to-face are effective in reducing pain intensity and disability for children and adolescents (<18 years) with headache, and therapeutic gains appear to be maintained, although this should be treated with caution for the disability outcome as only two studies could be included in the follow-up analysis. Psychological therapies are also beneficial at reducing anxiety post-treatment for headache. For non-headache conditions, psychological treatments were found to be beneficial for pain and disability post-treatment but these effects were not maintained at follow-up. There is limited evidence available to estimate the effects of psychological therapies on depression and anxiety for children and adolescents with headache and non-headache pain. The conclusions of this update replicate and add to those of the previous review which found that psychological therapies were effective in reducing pain intensity for children with headache and non-headache pain conditions, and these effects were maintained at follow-up for children with headache conditions.
这是对最初发表于2003年第1期的Cochrane系统评价的更新,之前曾在2009年和2012年进行过更新。慢性疼痛影响着许多儿童,他们报告有严重疼痛、残疾和情绪困扰。心理治疗正逐渐成为治疗慢性或复发性疼痛儿童的有效干预措施。本次更新特别关注面对面实施的心理治疗,增加了新的随机对照试验(RCT)以及先前纳入试验的更多数据。
本系统评价有三个目的。第一,确定与积极治疗、等待名单或标准医疗护理相比,面对面实施的心理治疗对儿童和青少年慢性及复发性疼痛的疼痛严重程度、残疾、抑郁和焦虑等临床结局的有效性。第二,评估心理治疗对抑郁和焦虑的影响,之前将其合并为“情绪”进行评估。第三,我们使用GRADE标准评估纳入研究的偏倚风险和结局质量。
检索了Cochrane中心对照试验注册库(CENTRAL)、医学期刊数据库(MEDLINE)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)和心理学文摘数据库(PsycINFO)。我们在所有已识别研究、荟萃分析和综述的参考文献中搜索进一步的RCT。还检索了试验注册数据库。最近一次检索日期为2014年1月。
每组至少有10名参与者的RCT,这些试验将心理治疗与积极治疗、标准医疗护理或等待名单对照进行比较,纳入患有发作性、复发性或持续性疼痛的儿童或青少年。仅考虑亲自实施(面对面)的试验。本次更新排除了远程提供治疗的研究。
对所有纳入研究进行分析,并评估结局质量。所有治疗合并为一类,即心理治疗。疼痛情况分为头痛和非头痛。两种情况均根据四个结局进行评估:疼痛、残疾、抑郁和焦虑。在两个时间点提取数据;治疗后(治疗结束后立即或可获得的最早数据)和随访时(治疗后3至12个月)。
在更新检索中识别出7篇论文。其中,5篇呈现新试验,2篇呈现先前纳入试验的随访数据。由于治疗是远程提供的,之前纳入本系统评价的5项研究被排除。因此,本系统评价共纳入37项研究。完成治疗的参与者总数为2111名。20项研究涉及头痛(包括偏头痛)治疗;9项涉及腹痛治疗;2项涉及包括头痛疼痛在内的混合性疼痛情况治疗,2项涉及纤维肌痛治疗,2项涉及复发性腹痛或肠易激综合征治疗,2项涉及与镰状细胞病相关的疼痛治疗。分析显示心理治疗对慢性疼痛儿童在7个结局方面有益。对于头痛疼痛,心理治疗分别在治疗后和随访时减轻了疼痛(风险比(RR)2.47,95%置信区间(CI)1.97至3.09,z = 7.87,p < 0.01,治疗获益所需人数(NNTB) = 2.94;RR 2.89,95%CI 1.03至8.07,z = 2.02,p < 0.05,NNTB = 3.67)。心理治疗在治疗后和随访时对减轻头痛情况下的残疾也有小的有益效果(标准化均数差(SMD) -0.49,95%CI -0.74至 -0.24,z = 3.90,p < 0.01;SMD -0.4