Berchialla Paola, Scaioli Giacomo, Passi Stefano, Gianino Maria M
Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2014 Oct;20(5):551-8. doi: 10.1111/jep.12141. Epub 2014 May 5.
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To gain insight into the incidence of paediatric adverse events (AEs); to assess if there are significant differences among study results and to what extent methodological issues can explain them.
From November 2012 to January 2013, systematic literature searches were conducted on PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane Library. We selected studies from 1970 onwards that evaluated the incidence of AEs in hospitalized paediatric patients and included a minimum of 1000 patient records with the same definition of AE. Studies that reported only specific AEs or only a specific ward were not considered. Data were extracted on the method of data collection, study design, type of hospital, and the timing of the AE in relation to its discovery and the index admission (time frame). AE incidence and preventability were considered.
The pooled incidence of AEs was 2.0% (95% CI: 1.3-3.0%). Five methodological differences among studies were taken into account. Only the time frame of detected events had a statistically significant effect on the incidence of AEs (P<0.0001). The pooled incidence of preventable AEs was 46.2% (95% CI: 35.3-57.5%) with a high variability among studies.
Our meta-analysis confirms that AEs are a major public health issue. Although studies use the same definition of AE, the reported incidence of AEs and preventable AEs varied considerably. To direct prevention efforts properly, studies methodologically more homogeneous and more detailed about the standard of health care provided and the health system organization are needed.
原理、目的与目标:深入了解儿科不良事件(AE)的发生率;评估研究结果之间是否存在显著差异以及方法学问题能在多大程度上解释这些差异。
2012年11月至2013年1月,在PubMed、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆进行了系统的文献检索。我们选择了1970年以后评估住院儿科患者AE发生率且包含至少1000份具有相同AE定义的患者记录的研究。仅报告特定AE或仅特定病房情况的研究未被纳入。提取了关于数据收集方法、研究设计、医院类型以及AE发现时间与其索引入院时间(时间范围)的数据。考虑了AE发生率和可预防性。
AE的合并发生率为2.0%(95%可信区间:1.3 - 3.0%)。考虑了研究之间的五个方法学差异。仅检测事件的时间范围对AE发生率有统计学显著影响(P<0.0001)。可预防AE的合并发生率为46.2%(95%可信区间:35.3 - 57.5%),研究间差异较大。
我们的荟萃分析证实AE是一个主要的公共卫生问题。尽管研究使用相同的AE定义,但报告的AE和可预防AE发生率差异很大。为了正确指导预防工作,需要方法学上更统一且更详细说明所提供医疗保健标准和卫生系统组织的研究。