Suppr超能文献

创伤学与矫形外科学中电子学习项目自愿使用与强制使用后的高疗效及学生满意度——一项随访研究

High efficacy and students' satisfaction after voluntary vs mandatory use of an e-learning program in traumatology and orthopedics--a follow-up study.

作者信息

Back David Alexander, Haberstroh Nicole, Sostmann Kai, Schmidmaier Gerhard, Putzier Michael, Perka Carsten, Hoff Eike

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, German Armed Forces Hospital, Berlin, Germany; Dieter Scheffner Center for Medical Teaching and Educational Research, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Julius Wolff Institute and Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Department of Orthopedics, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

J Surg Educ. 2014 May-Jun;71(3):353-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.11.007. Epub 2014 Jan 3.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Within the last decade, e-learning has gained a consistent place in surgical teaching. However, as the use of new programs is often voluntary, more information on the implications of the data regarding user acceptance and knowledge with mandatory use is desirable, especially in the context of the long-term developments of courses.

MATERIALS

Starting in 2009, the e-learning program Network for Students in Traumatology and Orthopedics was offered in a voluntary blended learning context. Students' satisfaction and increase in knowledge were evaluated using questionnaires and written tests. With proven effectiveness, the program became a mandatory part of the curriculum, and students' attitudes and gain of knowledge were re-evaluated in 2010 and 2011 to detect differences in voluntary vs mandatory use.

RESULTS

In the evaluation questionnaires (n = 108 voluntary vs n = 361 mandatory), the overall appreciation regarding the offerings remained high. Significantly more students felt better prepared for clinical situations (p < 0.001) and asked for e-tutoring (p = 0.025) with mandatory use. In written tests, both voluntary (n = 70) and mandatory (n = 147) users showed significantly increased knowledge (p < 0.001). Starting with a lower base level (p < 0.001), mandatory users had a significantly higher absolute increase compared with voluntary users (p = 0.015), leading to a similar final level.

DISCUSSION

The presented blended learning concept was an efficient way to teach students orthopedics and traumatology. Data can support the assumption that even if the voluntary evaluation of e-learning offerings might be subject to a selection bias, the results can serve as a representative impression for the students' overall mood and their gain in knowledge. However, as changes would have to be anticipated when shifting to mandatory use, users' perceptions should be constantly evaluated.

摘要

引言

在过去十年中,电子学习在外科教学中占据了稳固的地位。然而,由于新程序的使用往往是自愿的,因此需要更多关于强制使用时数据对用户接受度和知识影响的信息,特别是在课程长期发展的背景下。

材料

从2009年开始,创伤学与矫形外科学学生网络电子学习项目在自愿混合学习的背景下提供。通过问卷调查和笔试评估学生的满意度和知识增长情况。由于证明了该项目的有效性,它成为课程的必修部分,并在2010年和2011年重新评估学生的态度和知识收获,以检测自愿使用与强制使用的差异。

结果

在评估问卷中(自愿使用n = 108,强制使用n = 361),对课程的总体评价仍然很高。在强制使用时,明显更多的学生感觉对临床情况准备更充分(p < 0.001)并要求电子辅导(p = 0.025)。在笔试中,自愿使用者(n = 70)和强制使用者(n = 147)的知识都有显著增加(p < 0.001)。强制使用者起始水平较低(p < 0.001),但与自愿使用者相比,绝对增长显著更高(p = 0.015),最终达到相似水平。

讨论

所呈现的混合学习概念是教授学生矫形外科学和创伤学的有效方式。数据可以支持这样的假设,即即使电子学习课程的自愿评估可能存在选择偏差,结果也可以作为学生总体情绪和知识收获的代表性印象。然而,由于转向强制使用时必须预期会有变化,应不断评估用户的看法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验