• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左心房斑点追踪超声心动图在预测持续性心房颤动电复律成功和 6 个月时维持窦性心律中的作用。

Role of left atrial speckle tracking echocardiography in predicting persistent atrial fibrillation electrical cardioversion success and sinus rhythm maintenance at 6 months.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

出版信息

Adv Med Sci. 2014 Mar;59(1):120-5. doi: 10.1016/j.advms.2013.10.003. Epub 2014 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.advms.2013.10.003
PMID:24797987
Abstract

PURPOSE

We assessed the value of left atrium speckle tracking imaging (STI) indices, and clinical and other echocardiographic parameters in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) patients to predict the efficacy of electrical cardioversion (EC) and sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance at 6 months.

MATERIAL/METHODS: Eighty persistent AF patients planned to receive EC, underwent echocardiography including STI. After 24h, patients with successful EC were examined to predict SR maintenance. After 6 months patients with no AF recurrence in electrocardiogram (ECG) underwent 7-day ECG to exclude silent AF. Every AF>1 min was a recurrence.

RESULTS

SR restored in 61 patients, 19 unsuccessful. Prior use of statins (68.8% vs. 42.1%, p=0.03) was the only factor, determined later by univariate analysis to be a significant EC success predictor (OR=1.09, CL ± 95% 1.001-1.019, p<0.03). Both groups received similar antiarrhythmics and had similar echocardiographic parameters. After 6 months, SR was maintained in 19 patients (31.1%, Group I); AF recurrences were registered in 42 patients (68.8%, Group II). In Group I, only the mitral valve deceleration time (MVDT) 224.18 ± 88.13 vs. 181.6 ± 60.6 in Group II, p=0.04) and the dispersion of time to peak longitudinal strain (dTPLS) (86.0 ± 68.3 vs. 151.8 ± 89.6, p=0.03) differed significantly. The univariate analysis revealed dTPLS as a significant predictor of SR maintenance.

CONCLUSION

High EC efficacy and frequent AF recurrences were observed. The dispersion of time to the maximal longitudinal strain (LS) of left atrial segments facilitated prediction of SR maintenance. The value of 7-day ECG monitoring for detection of arrhythmia after 6 months was limited.

摘要

目的

我们评估了左心房斑点追踪成像(STI)指数以及持续性心房颤动(AF)患者的临床和其他超声心动图参数在预测电复律(EC)和窦性心律(SR)维持 6 个月时的疗效中的价值。

材料/方法:计划接受 EC 的 80 例持续性 AF 患者接受超声心动图检查,包括 STI。在 24 小时后,对成功进行 EC 的患者进行检查以预测 SR 维持情况。在 6 个月后,在心电图(ECG)中没有 AF 复发的患者进行了 7 天的 ECG 检查以排除无症状 AF。任何>1 分钟的 AF 均为复发。

结果

61 例患者恢复 SR,19 例未成功。他汀类药物的先前使用(68.8%比 42.1%,p=0.03)是唯一的因素,随后的单因素分析确定其是 EC 成功的显著预测因素(OR=1.09,CL ± 95% 1.001-1.019,p<0.03)。两组均接受了类似的抗心律失常药物治疗,且超声心动图参数相似。6 个月后,19 例患者维持 SR(31.1%,I 组);42 例患者发生 AF 复发(68.8%,II 组)。在 I 组中,只有二尖瓣减速时间(MVDT)224.18 ± 88.13 与 II 组中的 181.6 ± 60.6 有显著差异(p=0.04),时间至峰值纵向应变的离散度(dTPLS)(86.0 ± 68.3 与 151.8 ± 89.6,p=0.03)也有显著差异。单因素分析显示 dTPLS 是 SR 维持的显著预测因子。

结论

观察到高 EC 疗效和频繁的 AF 复发。左心房节段最大纵向应变(LS)时间的离散度有助于预测 SR 的维持。6 个月后 7 天 ECG 监测对检测心律失常的价值有限。

相似文献

1
Role of left atrial speckle tracking echocardiography in predicting persistent atrial fibrillation electrical cardioversion success and sinus rhythm maintenance at 6 months.左心房斑点追踪超声心动图在预测持续性心房颤动电复律成功和 6 个月时维持窦性心律中的作用。
Adv Med Sci. 2014 Mar;59(1):120-5. doi: 10.1016/j.advms.2013.10.003. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
2
Prognostic value of total atrial conduction time measured with tissue Doppler imaging to predict the maintenance of sinus rhythm after external electrical cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation.组织多普勒成像测量的总心房传导时间对预测持续性心房颤动体外电复律后窦性心律维持的预后价值。
Echocardiography. 2015 Mar;32(3):420-7. doi: 10.1111/echo.12702. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
3
Left atrial electromechanical conduction time can predict six-month maintenance of sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion in persistent atrial fibrillation by Doppler tissue echocardiography.经食管超声心动图组织多普勒技术测量左房机电传导时间可预测持续性心房颤动患者电复律后 6 个月窦性节律的维持。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Mar;23(3):309-14. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2009.12.019.
4
Left atrial emptying fraction determined during atrial fibrillation predicts maintenance of sinus rhythm after direct current cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.在持续性心房颤动患者中,心房颤动期间测量的左心房排空分数可预测直流电复律后窦性节律的维持。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 21;15(8):e0238002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238002. eCollection 2020.
5
The mechanical fibrillation pattern of the atrial myocardium is associated with acute and long-term success of electrical cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.心房心肌的机械性颤动模式与持续性心房颤动患者电复律的短期和长期成功率相关。
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Sep;11(9):1514-21. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.04.029. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
6
Left atrial strain is a powerful predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation: study of a heterogeneous population with sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation.左心房应变是导管消融术后心房颤动复发的有力预测因子:窦性心律或心房颤动的异质人群研究。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Sep;16(9):1008-14. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev028. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
7
Left atrial deformation imaging with ultrasound based two-dimensional speckle-tracking predicts the rate of recurrence of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation after successful ablation procedures.基于超声二维斑点追踪的左心房变形成像预测成功消融术后阵发性和持续性心房颤动的复发率。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Mar;23(3):247-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02177.x. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
8
Stunning of the left atrium after conversion of atrial fibrillation: predictor for maintenance of sinus rhythm?心房颤动转复后左心房顿抑:窦性心律维持的预测指标?
Echocardiography. 2005 May;22(5):402-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2005.03167.x.
9
The significance of the left atrial volume index in cardioversion success and its relationship with recurrence in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation subjected to electrical cardioversion: a study on diagnostic accuracy.左心房容积指数在非瓣膜性心房颤动患者电复律成功中的意义及其与复发的关系:一项诊断准确性研究
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2013 Feb;13(1):18-25. doi: 10.5152/akd.2013.003. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
10
Effect of left atrial size on recurrence of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion: atrial dimension versus volume.左心房大小对电复律后房颤复发的影响:心房内径与容积的比较
Am J Card Imaging. 1996 Oct;10(4):261-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Atrial Mechanics in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Electrical Cardioversion: A Systematic Review.接受电复律的心房颤动患者左心房力学的超声心动图评估:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 22;13(21):6296. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216296.
2
Echocardiographic Evaluation of Atrial Remodelling for the Prognosis of Maintaining Sinus Rhythm after Electrical Cardioversion in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.超声心动图评估心房重构对房颤患者电复律后维持窦性心律预后的影响
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 7;12(15):5158. doi: 10.3390/jcm12155158.
3
Left Atrial Wall Motion Velocity Assessed during Atrial Fibrillation Predicts Sinus Rhythm Maintenance after Electrical Cardioversion in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.
持续性心房颤动患者电复律后维持窦性心律与左房壁运动速度评估的相关性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 23;19(23):15508. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315508.
4
Multi-scale Entropy Evaluates the Proarrhythmic Condition of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Patients Predicting Early Failure of Electrical Cardioversion.多尺度熵评估持续性心房颤动患者的致心律失常状态,预测电复律早期失败。
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Jul 7;22(7):748. doi: 10.3390/e22070748.
5
Left atrial wall dyskinesia assessed during contractile phase as a predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence after electrical cardioversion performed due to persistent atrial fibrillation.在收缩期评估左心房壁运动障碍,作为因持续性心房颤动进行电复律后心房颤动复发的预测指标。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 4;99(49):e23333. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023333.
6
Left atrial emptying fraction determined during atrial fibrillation predicts maintenance of sinus rhythm after direct current cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.在持续性心房颤动患者中,心房颤动期间测量的左心房排空分数可预测直流电复律后窦性节律的维持。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 21;15(8):e0238002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238002. eCollection 2020.