Suppr超能文献

左心房应变是导管消融术后心房颤动复发的有力预测因子:窦性心律或心房颤动的异质人群研究。

Left atrial strain is a powerful predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation: study of a heterogeneous population with sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan

出版信息

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Sep;16(9):1008-14. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev028. Epub 2015 Mar 6.

Abstract

AIMS

Accumulating data show the efficacy of catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF); however, postoperative recurrence is not uncommon. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of AF recurrence in patients undergoing CA.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 100 patients with symptomatic paroxysmal (68) or persistent (32) AF who underwent CA preceded by transthoracic echocardiographic examination. Of these, 50 had sinus rhythm during echocardiography (Group NSR) and 50 had AF rhythm (Group AF). The left atrial (LA) strain was measured by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. Echocardiographic parameters were compared between the patients with AF recurrence and no recurrence. During 12 months of follow-up, 26 of 100 patients (11 in Group NSR and 15 in Group AF) had AF recurrence; these patients had significantly longer AF duration, a lower LA global strain (LA-GS), lower LA lateral total strain (LA-LS), and larger maximum LA volume index (LAVImax) than those who maintained sinus rhythm. Multivariate logistic regression identified basal LA-LS and LAVImax as independent predictors of AF recurrence. Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic analyses revealed that basal LA-LS was the most useful parameter for predicting AF recurrence [area under the curve (AUC): 0.84 vs. 0.74 in LAVImax]. Subanalyses showed that LAVImax was another independent predictor of AF recurrence in Group AF, but not in Group NSR, while basal LA-LS was a significant predictor in both groups.

CONCLUSION

LA myocardial function assessed by basal LA-LS could predict AF recurrence after CA. Notably, such an assessment could be applicable even during AF rhythm, suggesting its convenience in the clinical setting without defibrillation before analysis.

摘要

目的

越来越多的数据表明导管消融(CA)治疗心房颤动(AF)的疗效;然而,术后复发并不少见。本研究旨在确定接受 CA 治疗的患者 AF 复发的预测因素。

方法和结果

我们研究了 100 例因症状性阵发性(68 例)或持续性(32 例)AF 而行 CA 治疗的患者,这些患者均在接受 CA 治疗前行经胸超声心动图检查。其中 50 例在超声心动图时为窦性心律(NSR 组),50 例为 AF 心律(AF 组)。通过二维斑点追踪超声心动图测量左心房(LA)应变。比较了有和无 AF 复发的患者之间的超声心动图参数。在 12 个月的随访期间,100 例患者中有 26 例(NSR 组 11 例,AF 组 15 例)发生 AF 复发;这些患者的 AF 持续时间明显更长,LA 整体应变(LA-GS)、LA 侧壁总应变(LA-LS)更低,最大 LA 容积指数(LAVImax)更大。多变量逻辑回归确定基础 LA-LS 和 LAVImax 是 AF 复发的独立预测因子。此外,受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,基础 LA-LS 是预测 AF 复发最有用的参数[曲线下面积(AUC):LA-LS 为 0.84,LAVImax 为 0.74]。亚组分析显示,在 AF 组中,LAVImax 是 AF 复发的另一个独立预测因子,但在 NSR 组中不是,而基础 LA-LS 是两个组中均有意义的预测因子。

结论

通过基础 LA-LS 评估 LA 心肌功能可预测 CA 后 AF 的复发。值得注意的是,即使在 AF 心律时也可以进行这种评估,提示其在临床环境中的便利性,无需在分析前进行除颤。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验