• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Closure of elective abdominal incisions with monofilament, non-absorbable suture material versus polyfilament absorbable suture material.

作者信息

Talpur Altaf Ahmed, Awan Mohammad Sharif, Surhio Abdul Rasheed

出版信息

J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2011 Apr-Jun;23(2):51-4.

PMID:24800342
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Closure of abdominal incisions with different suture materials has been a matter of great controversy. Polypropylene and Polylactide with Polyglycolide are among the commonest suture materials used for closure of abdominal incisions. Objectives of this study were to assess optimal suture material used for closure of elective abdominal incisions and to see complications associated with these suture materials.

METHODS

This prospective, comparative, randomised study was conducted at public and private sector hospitals of Nawabshah and Hyderabad from 1st Jan 2005 to 31st October 2009. All patients who underwent abdominal surgery under the investigators' supervision were included in the study. Patients were divided into 2 groups on even or odd numbers. In group-A patients' incision was closed with monofilament, non-absorbable Polypropylene (Prolene) No. 1 suture material and in group-B incision was closed with Polyfilament, absorbable, co-polymer of Polylactide with Polyglycolide (Vicryle) No. 1.

RESULTS

A total 274 patients were finally analysed for closure of elective abdominal incisions, with 138 (50.4%) patients in Group-A and 136 (49.6%) patients in Group-B. Vicryle was found superior in knot security and suture handling. Superficial wound infection was found in 5.79% patients of Group-A and 6.61% of Group-B. Discharging sinus was found in 3.62% of Group-A vs 0.73% of Group-B. Burst abdomen was seen in 2.17% patients in Group-A and 1.47% in Group-B. Incisional hernia was present in 4.34% of Group-A and 0.73% patients of Group-B. No patient in Group-B developed persistent pain at incisional site while it was found in 8.69% patients of Group-A.

CONCLUSION

Polylactide is an optimal suture material in closure of elective abdominal incisions.

摘要

相似文献

1
Closure of elective abdominal incisions with monofilament, non-absorbable suture material versus polyfilament absorbable suture material.
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2011 Apr-Jun;23(2):51-4.
2
Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.用于预防切口疝及其他伤口并发症的剖腹手术切口闭合方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 3;11(11):CD005661. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005661.pub2.
3
Incisional hernia after abdominal closure with slowly absorbable versus fast absorbable, antibacterial-coated sutures.腹部缝合时使用慢吸收与快吸收、抗菌涂层缝线,哪种缝线导致切口疝的风险更低?
Surgery. 2012 Mar;151(3):398-403. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.08.004. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
4
A systematic review on the effectiveness of slowly-absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for abdominal fascial closure following laparotomy.一种关于在剖腹术后腹部筋膜关闭时使用可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线的有效性的系统评价。
Int J Surg. 2011;9(8):615-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.09.006. Epub 2011 Oct 30.
5
Role of suture material and technique of closure in wound outcome following laparotomy for peritonitis.剖腹探查治疗腹膜炎后缝线材料及缝合技术对伤口愈合结果的影响。
Trop Gastroenterol. 2009 Oct-Dec;30(4):237-40.
6
The effect on incisional hernia of absorbable barbed suture for midline fascial closure in minimally invasive surgery for colorectal and gastric cancers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.可吸收带刺缝线用于结直肠和胃癌微创手术中正中筋膜闭合对切口疝的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 May 6;24(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07324-x.
7
Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of MonoMax® suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy-a controlled prospective multicentre trial: ISSAAC [NCT005725079].经初次正中剖腹手术后使用 MonoMax®缝线进行腹壁缝合的安全性和有效性评估:一项对照前瞻性多中心试验:ISSAAC [NCT005725079]。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Mar;397(3):363-71. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0884-6. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
8
[Current standards of abdominal wall closure techniques : Conventional suture techniques].[腹壁关闭技术的当前标准:传统缝合技术]
Chirurg. 2016 Sep;87(9):737-743. doi: 10.1007/s00104-016-0231-0.
9
Abdominal fascia closure following elective midline laparotomy: a surgical experience at a tertiary care hospital in Tanzania.择期正中剖腹术后腹部筋膜关闭:坦桑尼亚一家三级护理医院的手术经验
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Jun 30;8:281. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1243-4.
10
A prospective single-arm clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of monofilament polydioxanone barbed suture, MONOFIX, on abdominal fascial closure.一项评估单丝聚二氧六环酮带刺缝合线(MONOFIX)用于腹部筋膜关闭的安全性和有效性的前瞻性单臂临床试验。
World J Surg. 2024 Jul;48(7):1674-1680. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12247. Epub 2024 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Suture Techniques and Materials for Fascial Closure of Abdominal Wall Incisions: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis.腹壁切口筋膜闭合的缝合技术与材料:一项全面的荟萃分析。
Ann Surg Open. 2025 Mar 4;6(1):e548. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000548. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Suture choice to reduce occurrence of surgical site infection, hernia, wound dehiscence and sinus/fistula: a network meta-analysis.减少手术部位感染、疝气、伤口裂开和窦道/瘘管发生的缝线选择:一项网状荟萃分析
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019 Mar;101(3):150-161. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0170. Epub 2018 Oct 5.