Suppr超能文献

晚期癌症患者与八种非癌症疾病患者在姑息治疗相关问题的患病率上是否存在差异?一项系统综述。

Are there differences in the prevalence of palliative care-related problems in people living with advanced cancer and eight non-cancer conditions? A systematic review.

作者信息

Moens Katrien, Higginson Irene J, Harding Richard

机构信息

Department of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Department of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Oct;48(4):660-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.11.009. Epub 2014 May 5.

Abstract

CONTEXT

If access to effective palliative care is to extend beyond cancer patients, an understanding of the comparative prevalence of palliative care problems among cancer and non-cancer patients is necessary.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aimed to describe and compare the prevalence of seventeen palliative care-related problems across the four palliative care domains among adults with advanced cancer, acquired immune deficiency syndrome, chronic heart failure, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, multiple sclerosis, motor neuron disease, Parkinson's disease, and dementia.

METHODS

Three databases were searched using three groups of keywords. The results of the extraction of the prevalence figures were summarized.

RESULTS

The electronic searches yielded 4697 hits after the removal of 1784 duplicates. Of these hits, 143 met the review criteria. The greatest number of studies were found for advanced cancer (n=57) and ESRD patients (n=47), and 75 of the 143 studies used validated scales. Few data were available for people living with multiple sclerosis (n=2) and motor neuron disease (n=3). The problems with a prevalence of 50% or more found across most of the nine studied diagnostic groups were: pain, fatigue, anorexia, dyspnea, and worry.

CONCLUSION

There are commonalities in the prevalence of problems across cancer and non-cancer patients, highlighting the need for palliative care to be provided irrespective of diagnosis. The methodological heterogeneity across the studies and the lack of non-cancer studies need to be addressed in future research.

摘要

背景

若要使有效的姑息治疗惠及癌症患者以外的人群,就有必要了解癌症患者与非癌症患者中姑息治疗问题的相对患病率。

目的

本系统评价旨在描述和比较晚期癌症、获得性免疫缺陷综合征、慢性心力衰竭、终末期肾病(ESRD)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、多发性硬化症、运动神经元病、帕金森病和痴呆症成年患者在四个姑息治疗领域中17个与姑息治疗相关问题的患病率。

方法

使用三组关键词检索三个数据库。对患病率数据提取结果进行总结。

结果

去除1784条重复记录后,电子检索共获得4697条记录。其中,143条符合纳入标准。关于晚期癌症患者(n = 57)和ESRD患者(n = 47)的研究最多,143项研究中有75项使用了经过验证的量表。关于多发性硬化症患者(n = 2)和运动神经元病患者(n = 3)的数据很少。在九个研究诊断组中的大多数组中,患病率达到或超过50%的问题有:疼痛、疲劳、厌食、呼吸困难和担忧。

结论

癌症患者和非癌症患者中问题的患病率存在共性,这凸显了无论诊断如何都需提供姑息治疗的必要性。研究中的方法学异质性以及非癌症研究的缺乏需要在未来研究中加以解决。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验