Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014 Jul;113(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2014.04.013. Epub 2014 May 5.
Recent research has emphasized the need to better discriminate asthma phenotypes and consider underlying mechanistic endotypes in epidemiologic and clinical studies. Although allergic asthma and nonallergic asthma are frequently combined into 1 disease category in observational research and clinical trials, few studies have investigated the extent to which these 2 separate phenotypes are associated with distinct cytokine immunologic profiles in a representative young adult population.
To investigate the cytokine production-based endotypes underlying the clinical phenotypes of allergic and nonallergic asthma in a population-based birth cohort evaluated as young adults.
Participants included 18- to 21-year-old members (n = 540) of a suburban Detroit birth cohort study, the Childhood Allergy Study. Phorbol myristate acetate-stimulated whole blood interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-22, and interferon-γ secretory responses were analyzed for associations comparing participants with allergic vs nonallergic asthma phenotypes with those without asthma.
T-helper cell type (TH) 2-polarized responses, measured as higher mean IL-5 and IL-13 secretions and lower ratios of interferon-γ and IL-12 to 3 TH2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, or IL-13), were observed only in participants with allergic asthma. Nonallergic asthma was associated with TH1-polarized responses, including higher adjusted interferon-γ secretion compared with participants with allergic asthma and, surprisingly, those without asthma (odds ratio 2.5, confidence interval 1.2-5.1, P < .01).
As expected, young adults with a history of an allergic asthma phenotype exhibited a TH2-polarized cytokine response after polyclonal stimulation. However, TH1 polarization was observed in patients with a history of nonallergic asthma. Allergic and nonallergic asthma are associated with etiologically distinct immune endotypes, underscoring the importance of discriminating these endotypes in research analyses and clinical management.
最近的研究强调,需要更好地区分哮喘表型,并在流行病学和临床研究中考虑潜在的机制内型。尽管在观察性研究和临床试验中,过敏性哮喘和非过敏性哮喘通常合并为 1 种疾病类别,但很少有研究调查这两种独立表型在代表性年轻成年人中与不同细胞因子免疫谱相关的程度。
在一个基于人群的出生队列中,作为年轻人评估,调查过敏性和非过敏性哮喘临床表型背后的细胞因子产生内型。
参与者包括底特律郊区出生队列研究(儿童过敏研究)中 18 至 21 岁的成员(n=540)。分析佛波醇肉豆蔻酸酯刺激的全血白细胞介素(IL)-4、IL-5、IL-10、IL-12、IL-13、IL-17A、IL-17F、IL-22 和干扰素-γ分泌反应,以比较具有过敏性与非过敏性哮喘表型的参与者与无哮喘的参与者之间的关联。
仅在具有过敏性哮喘的参与者中观察到 TH2 极化反应,表现为更高的平均 IL-5 和 IL-13 分泌,以及干扰素-γ和 IL-12 与 3 种 TH2 细胞因子(IL-4、IL-5 或 IL-13)的比值较低。非过敏性哮喘与 TH1 极化反应相关,包括与具有过敏性哮喘的参与者相比,以及与无哮喘的参与者相比,调整后的干扰素-γ分泌更高(比值比 2.5,95%置信区间 1.2-5.1,P<.01)。
正如预期的那样,具有过敏性哮喘表型病史的年轻成年人在多克隆刺激后表现出 TH2 极化细胞因子反应。然而,在具有非过敏性哮喘病史的患者中观察到 TH1 极化。过敏性和非过敏性哮喘与病因不同的免疫内型相关,这强调了在研究分析和临床管理中区分这些内型的重要性。