• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

死因裁判庭法律与实践:人权视角

Coronial law and practice: a human rights perspective.

作者信息

Freckelton Ian, McGregor Simon

出版信息

J Law Med. 2014 Mar;21(3):584-601.

PMID:24804530
Abstract

Coronial law and practice inevitably impact upon the human rights of those affected by deaths. It is important that such rights be incorporated in how death investigations, up to and including coronial inquests, take place. This article explores the significant impact of the jurisprudence emanating from the European Court of Human Rights, as well as the application of such law by the courts of the United Kingdom and potentially in other countries. It argues that viewing the work of coroners through the lens of human rights is a constructive approach and that, although in the coronial legislation of Australia and New Zealand, many human rights, especially those of family members, and civil liberties are explicitly protected, there remain real advantages in reflecting upon compliance with human rights by death investigation procedures and decision-making.

摘要

死因裁判法及其实践不可避免地会对受死亡影响者的人权产生影响。将此类权利纳入死亡调查(直至并包括死因裁判法庭审讯)的开展方式中非常重要。本文探讨了欧洲人权法院判例法的重大影响,以及联合王国法院乃至其他国家对此类法律的适用情况。文章认为,从人权角度审视死因裁判官的工作是一种建设性的方法,并且尽管在澳大利亚和新西兰的死因裁判立法中,许多人权,尤其是家庭成员的人权以及公民自由得到了明确保护,但通过死亡调查程序和决策来反思人权合规情况仍具有实际优势。

相似文献

1
Coronial law and practice: a human rights perspective.死因裁判庭法律与实践:人权视角
J Law Med. 2014 Mar;21(3):584-601.
2
Procedural Fairness and the Coroner.程序公平与验尸官
J Law Med. 2018 Oct;26(1):7-22.
3
Death investigation, the coroner and therapeutic jurisprudence.死亡调查、验尸官与治疗法理学。
J Law Med. 2007 Oct;15(2):242-53.
4
Interstate and Overseas Deaths: Jurisdictional and Decision-Making Challenges for Coroners.州际和海外死亡:验尸官面临的管辖权和决策挑战
J Law Med. 2019 Apr;26(3):519-534.
5
Anglo-Australian coronial law reform: the widening gap.英澳死因裁判法改革:差距不断扩大。
J Law Med. 2010 Feb;17(4):471-80.
6
An empirical approach to the New Zealand government's review of the coronial jurisdiction.新西兰政府对死因裁判管辖权审查的实证方法。
J Law Med. 2014 Mar;21(3):602-26.
7
Coroners court and directions to juries in Article 2 inquests.死因裁判法庭及对第2条死因调查中陪审团的指示。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2019 Jul;65:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2019.03.010. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
8
"Blowed off by a side wind"? Coronial inquests following criminal acquittals.“被一阵侧风吹走了”?刑事无罪判决后的死因裁判庭调查。
J Law Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):595-608.
9
Executive impunity and parallel justice? The United Kingdom debate on secret inquests and inquiries.行政豁免权与并行司法?英国关于秘密死因调查和调查的辩论。
J Law Med. 2012 Mar;19(3):569-92.
10
The sideshow or the circus? The role for public interest organisations at inquests.杂耍表演还是马戏团?公共利益组织在死因调查中的作用。
J Law Med. 2012 Dec;20(2):320-32.