Baykara Zehra Gocmen, Demir Sevil Guler, Karadag Ayise, Harputlu Deniz, Kahraman Aysel, Karadag Sercan, Hin Aysel Oren, Togluk Eylem, Altinsoy Meral, Erdem Sonca, Cihan Rabia
Gazi University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Ankara, Turkey.
Gazi University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Ankara, Turkey; email:
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2014 May;60(5):16-26.
Even though preoperative marking of the stoma area is considered important for the prevention of postoperative complications, not all healthcare institutions have universally adopted this practice. A multicenter, retrospective, descriptive study was conducted to determine the effect of stoma site marking on stomal and peristomal complications. The 1-year study included 748 patients (408 [54.5%] male, mean age 56.60 ± 16.73 years) from eight stomatherapy units in Turkey. Patient data, including age, gender, diagnosis, type of surgery, history of preoperative stoma site marking, person performing the marking, and postoperative complications, were obtained from patient records, abstracted, and analyzed. Cancer was the reason for the operation in 545 (72.9%) of the cases. In 287 patients (38.4%), the stoma and wound care nurse and/or surgeon marked the stoma area; this occurred 1 day before or on the day of surgery according to Wound Ostomy Continence Nurses Society and American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons recommendations. Stomal/ peristomal complications developed in 248 (33.2%) persons; the most frequently observed complications in patients were parastomal skin problems (136, 48.7%), mucocutaneous separation (52, 18.6%), and retraction (31, 11.1%). The rate of complications was higher among patients whose stoma site was not marked than among those whose stoma site was marked (22.9% and 46%, respectively; P <0.001). The results of this study confirm the stoma area should be marked preoperatively in all planned surgical interventions in order to reduce the risk of postoperative complications. Additional prospective and experimental studies on effectiveness of preoperative stoma site marking should be conducted with larger sample groups.
尽管术前标记造口区域被认为对预防术后并发症很重要,但并非所有医疗机构都普遍采用这种做法。开展了一项多中心、回顾性、描述性研究,以确定造口部位标记对造口及造口周围并发症的影响。这项为期1年的研究纳入了来自土耳其8个造口治疗单位的748例患者(408例[54.5%]为男性,平均年龄56.60±16.73岁)。从患者记录中获取患者数据,包括年龄、性别、诊断、手术类型、术前造口部位标记史、进行标记的人员以及术后并发症,进行提取和分析。545例(72.9%)病例的手术原因是癌症。287例患者(38.4%)的造口和伤口护理护士和/或外科医生标记了造口区域;根据伤口造口失禁护理护士协会和美国结肠和直肠外科医生协会的建议,这在手术前1天或手术当天进行。248人(33.2%)出现了造口/造口周围并发症;患者中最常观察到的并发症是造口旁皮肤问题(136例,48.7%)、黏膜皮肤分离(52例,18.6%)和回缩(31例,11.1%)。造口部位未标记的患者并发症发生率高于造口部位已标记的患者(分别为22.9%和46%;P<0.001)。本研究结果证实,为降低术后并发症风险,所有计划性手术干预均应在术前标记造口区域。应使用更大样本量的群体开展关于术前造口部位标记有效性的额外前瞻性和实验性研究。