Stokes Audrey L, Tice Shelly, Follett Suzi, Paskey Diane, Abraham Lini, Bealer Cheryl, Keister Holly, Koltun Walter, Puleo Frances J
Audrey L. Stokes, MD, Department of Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania. Shelly Tice, BSN, RN, Department of Nursing, The Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania. Suzi Follett, BSN, RN, CWOCN, Department of Nursing, The Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania. Diane Paskey, BSN, RN, CWOCN, Department of Nursing, The Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania. Lini Abraham, BSN, RN, CWOCN, Department of Nursing, The Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania. Cheryl Bealer, BSN, RN, CWOCN, Department of Nursing, The Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania. Holly Keister, BSN, RN, CWOCN, Department of Nursing, The Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania. Walter Koltun, MD, Department of Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania. Frances J. Puleo, MD, Department of Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2017 Jul/Aug;44(4):363-367. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000338.
The purpose of this study was to compare selected postoperative complications (including stomal and peristomal complications), hospital length of stay, and readmission rates in a group of patients who attended a preoperative educational intervention to a retrospective group of patients who did not receive the intervention.
Retrospective, comparison cohort study.
The intervention group comprised 124 patients who attended an educational session for persons with fecal ostomies at a single tertiary care center in the Northeastern United States. They were compared to findings from a group of 94 individuals who underwent ostomy surgery during a 1-year period before initiation of the class. Patients undergoing emergent procedures or who had previous stomas were excluded. We found no significant differences between the 2 cohorts with respect to age, gender, comorbidities, open versus minimally invasive procedures, or colorectal diagnoses.
A preoperative 2-hour stoma education class was led by certified WOC nurses for all patients undergoing colorectal surgeries in which the creation of a stoma was anticipated. This session included a didactic portion outlining postoperative expectations in the management of new ostomies (including dietary changes, prevention of dehydration, and an overview of ostomy supplies), as well as a hands-on portion to practice stoma care skills. We compared postoperative complications within 30 days (particularly stoma-related complications, including pouch leakage due to loss of seal, and peristomal skin irritation) between the group attending the education session and the control group. We also compared length of stay and 30-day readmission rates.
Patients who participated in the educational intervention experienced significantly fewer peristomal complications than did patients in the historic control group (44.7% vs 20.2%, P = .002). Logistic regression analysis revealed that participation in the group was associated with a lower likelihood of peristomal skin complications (odds ratio = 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.67). Their length of stay (median 6 days vs 5 days, P = NS), and the proportion who experienced 30-day readmission (20.2% vs 15.3%, P = NS), did not significantly differ.
A preoperative stoma education group class significantly reduced the likelihood of frequent leakage from the ostomy pouching system and peristomal skin irritation.
本研究旨在比较一组参加术前教育干预的患者与一组未接受该干预的回顾性患者的特定术后并发症(包括造口及造口周围并发症)、住院时间和再入院率。
回顾性比较队列研究。
干预组由美国东北部一家三级医疗中心参加粪便造口患者教育课程的124名患者组成。将他们与在该课程开始前1年期间接受造口手术的94名患者的研究结果进行比较。排除接受急诊手术或既往有造口的患者。我们发现这两个队列在年龄、性别、合并症、开放手术与微创手术、或结直肠诊断方面无显著差异。
由认证的伤口造口失禁护理(WOC)护士为所有预计进行造口手术的结直肠手术患者开展术前2小时的造口教育课程。该课程包括一个讲解部分,概述新造口管理的术后预期(包括饮食变化、预防脱水和造口用品概述),以及一个实践造口护理技能的实操部分。我们比较了参加教育课程的组与对照组在30天内的术后并发症(特别是与造口相关的并发症,包括因密封失效导致的造口袋渗漏和造口周围皮肤刺激)。我们还比较了住院时间和30天再入院率。
参加教育干预的患者发生的造口周围并发症明显少于历史对照组患者(44.7%对20.2%,P = 0.002)。逻辑回归分析显示,参加该组与造口周围皮肤并发症的可能性较低相关(比值比 = 0.35;95%置信区间,0.18 - 0.67)。他们的住院时间(中位数6天对5天,P = 无统计学意义)以及经历30天再入院的比例(20.2%对15.3%,P = 无统计学意义)没有显著差异。
术前造口教育小组课程显著降低了造口袋系统频繁渗漏和造口周围皮肤刺激的可能性。