• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术进修培训的影响。

Impact of fellowship during single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

作者信息

Romero Rey Jesús, Arad Jonathan Kirsch, Kosanovic Radomir, Lamoureux Julie, Gonzalez Anthony Michael

出版信息

JSLS. 2014 Jan-Mar;18(1):8-13. doi: 10.4293/108680813x13693422520765.

DOI:10.4293/108680813x13693422520765
PMID:24809141
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3939348/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Minimally invasive surgery fellowship programs have been created in response to advancements in technology and patient's demands. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is a technique that has been shown to be safe and feasible, but this appears to be the case only for experienced surgeons. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of minimally invasive surgery fellow participation during SILC.

METHODS

We reviewed data from our experience with SILC during 3 years. The cases were divided in two groups: group 1 comprised procedures performed by the main attending without the presence of the fellow, and group 2 comprised procedures performed with the fellow present during the operation. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, indication for surgery, total surgical time, hospital length of stay, and complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

The cohort included 229 patients: 142 (62%) were included in group 1 and 87 (38%) in group 2. No differences were found in demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and indication for surgery between groups. The total surgical time was 34.4 ± 11.4 minutes for group 1 and 46.8 ± 16.0 minutes for group 2 (P < .001). The hospital length of stay was 0.89 0.32 days for group 1 and 1.01 ± 0.40 days for group 2 (P = .027). No intraoperative complications were seen in either group. There were 3 postoperative complications (2.1%) in group 1 and none in group 2 (P = .172).

CONCLUSION

Adoption of SILC during an established fellowship program is safe and feasible. A longer surgical time is expected during the teaching process.

摘要

背景与目的

随着技术进步和患者需求的变化,微创外科进修项目应运而生。单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)是一项已被证明安全可行的技术,但这似乎仅适用于经验丰富的外科医生。本研究旨在评估微创外科进修医生参与单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的影响。

方法

我们回顾了3年期间单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的经验数据。病例分为两组:第1组为主要主治医生在无进修医生在场的情况下进行的手术,第2组为手术过程中有进修医生在场的手术。评估了人口统计学特征、合并症、手术指征、总手术时间、住院时间和并发症情况。

结果

该队列包括229例患者:第1组142例(62%),第2组87例(38%)。两组在人口统计学特征、合并症和手术指征方面未发现差异。第1组的总手术时间为34.4±11.4分钟,第2组为46.8±16.0分钟(P<.001)。第1组的住院时间为0.89±0.32天,第2组为1.01±0.40天(P=.027)。两组均未出现术中并发症。第1组有3例术后并发症(2.1%),第2组无(P=.172)。

结论

在既定的进修项目中采用单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术是安全可行的。教学过程中预计手术时间会更长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/586e/3939348/d527cfedb2bc/jls0031331300002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/586e/3939348/c836083f00fb/jls0031331300001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/586e/3939348/d527cfedb2bc/jls0031331300002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/586e/3939348/c836083f00fb/jls0031331300001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/586e/3939348/d527cfedb2bc/jls0031331300002.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of fellowship during single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术进修培训的影响。
JSLS. 2014 Jan-Mar;18(1):8-13. doi: 10.4293/108680813x13693422520765.
2
Can residents safely and efficiently be taught single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy?能否安全有效地教授住院医师进行单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术?
J Surg Educ. 2012 Jul-Aug;69(4):468-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 May 5.
3
Learning curve of transumbilical suture-suspension single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.经脐缝合悬吊式单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的学习曲线。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug 7;19(29):4786-90. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i29.4786.
4
Learning curve of transumbilical single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILS): a preliminary study of 80 selected patients with benign gallbladder diseases.经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILS)的学习曲线:80 例良性胆囊疾病患者的初步研究。
World J Surg. 2011 Sep;35(9):2092-101. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1144-1.
5
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a combined analysis of resident and attending learning curves at a single institution.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:单一机构住院医师与主治医生学习曲线的综合分析
Am Surg. 2012 Jan;78(1):119-24.
6
From multi-incision to single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy step-by-step: one surgeon's self-taught experience and retrospective analysis.从多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术到单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一位外科医生的自学经验和回顾性分析。
Asian J Surg. 2013 Jan;36(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
7
Comparison study of clinical outcomes between single-site robotic cholecystectomy and single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单部位机器人胆囊切除术与单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术临床疗效的对比研究。
Asian J Surg. 2017 Nov;40(6):424-428. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 May 14.
8
Single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC) versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC): comparison of learning curves. First European experience.单部位机器人胆囊切除术(SSRC)与单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC):学习曲线比较。首次欧洲经验。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Jun;26(6):1648-55. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2087-1. Epub 2011 Dec 17.
9
Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)-a matched pair analysis.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)与腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的配对分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Aug;396(6):819-24. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0817-4. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
10
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children using standard straight instruments: a surgeon's early experience.使用标准直器械进行儿童单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:外科医生的早期经验。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011 Jul-Aug;21(6):555-9. doi: 10.1089/lap.2010.0512. Epub 2011 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Why do not we talk about MIS fellowship? A short review of the short literature.我们为什么不谈谈 MIS 奖学金呢?对短篇文献的简短回顾。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):5956-5959. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10023-y. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
2
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for biliary tract disease.单孔腹腔镜手术治疗胆道疾病。
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan 14;22(2):736-47. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.736.
3
A multicenter study of initial experience with single-incision robotic cholecystectomies (SIRC) demonstrating a high success rate in 465 cases.

本文引用的文献

1
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus traditional four-port cholecystectomy.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统四孔胆囊切除术的比较
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2012 Oct;25(4):319-23. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2012.11928866.
2
Cholecystectomy by single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS): early experience and technique standardization.单孔腹腔镜手术(SILS)胆囊切除术:早期经验与技术标准化
G Chir. 2012 Aug-Sep;33(8-9):280-4.
3
Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis.单孔与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项荟萃分析
一项关于单切口机器人胆囊切除术(SIRC)初步经验的多中心研究,该研究显示465例手术成功率很高。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):2951-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4583-1. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
ANZ J Surg. 2012 Dec;82(12):885-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06284.x. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
4
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项系统评价
Arch Surg. 2012 Jul;147(7):657-66. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.814.
5
Single-fulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single-incision and multi-port technique.单支点腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一种单切口多端口技术。
ANZ J Surg. 2012 Jul-Aug;82(7-8):529-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06125.x. Epub 2012 Jul 8.
6
Early experience in single-site laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单部位腹腔镜胆囊切除术的早期经验。
Singapore Med J. 2012 Jun;53(6):377-80.
7
Can residents safely and efficiently be taught single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy?能否安全有效地教授住院医师进行单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术?
J Surg Educ. 2012 Jul-Aug;69(4):468-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 May 5.
8
Single incision vs. conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparison of two approaches.单切口与传统多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:两种方法的比较。
Int J Surg. 2012;10(7):368-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.05.017. Epub 2012 Jun 2.
9
The impact of endovascular procedures on fellowship training in lower extremity revascularization.腔内手术对下肢血运重建专科培训的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Jun;55(6):1814-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.01.082.
10
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs. conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Aug;16(8):1618-28. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1906-6. Epub 2012 May 12.