Suppr超能文献

[目标能量摄入对脓毒症患者预后的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验]

[Impact of target energy intake on outcomes in septic patients : a prospective randomized controlled trial].

作者信息

Liu Zhaohui, Su Lei, Liao Yinguang, Liu Zhifeng, Liu Junling

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014 Mar;26(3):131-4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To observe the impact of the diverse caloric energy intake on the outcomes and occurrence rate of complications in septic patients.

METHODS

A prospective single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted. 158 cases of septic patients in intensive care unit (ICU) were enrolled and randomly assigned to three groups according to their different target value of nutrition: group A [measurements of resting energy expenditure ( MREE) <90% J , B ( MREE 90%-110%) and C ( MREE > 110%). The caloric intake, mechanical ventilation duration ( MVD),nosocomial infection rate, 28-day and 60-day mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS

Daily energy intake in 7 days after ICU admission was as follows: the difference in target value of nutrition ( kJ/d: 7 075.0 ± 1 046.5, 5 667.8 ± 1 908.8,4 428.8 ± 1 377.8), calory intake ( k]/d: 4 671.6 ± 1 205.6, 5 655.3 ± 1 373.0, 6 053.0 ± 1 557.2), enteral nutrition value ( kJ/d: 2 051.1 ± 1 046.5, 3 980.9 ± 1 586.5, 5 337.1 ± 2 921.8) and average intake rate [ ( 66.0 ± 15.8 )% ,( 100.0 ± 5.7 )% , ( 134.0 ± 19.7)% J, and they were statistically significant difference among A, B, C groups (all P<0.05 ). The parenteral nutrition in group C were much higher than that in group A and group B ( kJ/d: 2 055.3 ± 273.4vs. 427.0 ± 273.4, 473.0 ± 332.0, both P<0.05 ). The calories provided by glucose and diprivan were similar among three groups. The MVD and ICU stay were shorter in group B than that in groups A and C [ MVD (days): 8.4 ± 6.3 vs.11.0 ± 8.2, 17.8 ± 13.0, P>0.05 and P<0.05; ICU stay (days): 11.0 ± 6.4 vs. 14.9 ± 9.6, 17.8 ± 13.0, respectively,P>0.05 and P<0.05]. The total hospital stay (days: 32.0 ± 22.5, 26.8 ± 7.0, 30.4 ± 21.4) and nosocomial infection rate [ 91.1% ( 51156) , 84.0% ( 42/50) , 90.4% ( 4 7/52) J were similar among A, B, C groups (all P>0.05). There was no difference in survival rate at 28 days among three groups as shown by the Kaplan-Meier survival curve ( F=3.145,P=0.076 ). The survival rate at 60 days showed a tendency of lowering in groups A and C, especially in group C (F=9.284, P=0.010).

CONCLUSION

Both higher and lower caloric energy intake may be associated with an adverse impact, but appropriate caloric intake would improve the outcome and reduce the complication rate in septic patients.

摘要

目的

观察不同热量摄入对脓毒症患者预后及并发症发生率的影响。

方法

进行一项前瞻性单盲随机对照试验。选取158例重症监护病房(ICU)的脓毒症患者,根据不同的营养目标值将其随机分为三组:A组[静息能量消耗测量值(MREE)<90%]、B组(MREE 90% - 110%)和C组(MREE>110%)。分析热量摄入、机械通气时间(MVD)、医院感染率、28天和60天死亡率。

结果

ICU入院后7天的每日能量摄入如下:营养目标值差异(kJ/d:7075.0±1046.5、5667.8±1908.8、4428.8±1377.8)、热量摄入(kJ/d:4671.6±1205.6、5655.3±1373.0、6053.0±1557.2)、肠内营养值(kJ/d:2051.1±1046.5、3980.9±1586.5、5337.1±2921.8)及平均摄入率[(66.0±15.8)%、(100.0±5.7)%、(134.0±19.7)%],A、B、C组间差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。C组的肠外营养远高于A组和B组(kJ/d:2055.3±273.4 vs. 427.0±273.4、473.0±332.0,均P<0.05)。三组间葡萄糖和丙泊酚提供的热量相似。B组的MVD和ICU住院时间短于A组和C组[MVD(天):8.4±6.3 vs. 11.0±8.2、17.8±13.0,P>0.05和P<0.05;ICU住院时间(天):11.0±6.4 vs. 14.9±9.6、17.8±13.0,分别为P>0.05和P<0.05]。三组的总住院时间(天:32.0±22.5、26.8±7.0、30.4±21.4)和医院感染率[91.1%(51/56)、84.0%(42/50)、90.4%(47/52)]相似(均P>0.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验