Suppr超能文献

器官培养角膜与角膜供体研究的内皮细胞密度比较。

Comparison of endothelial cell density of organ cultured corneas with cornea donor study.

机构信息

*Corneal Graft Biology, Engineering and Imaging Laboratory, EA2521, Federative Institute of Research in Sciences and Health Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France; †Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Saint-Etienne, France; ‡Eye Bank of Saint-Etienne, Auvergne Loire Blood Center, Saint-Etienne, France; §Department of Pathology, University Hospital, Saint-Etienne, France; and ¶Institut Universitaire de France, Paris, France.

出版信息

Cornea. 2014 Jun;33(6):597-603. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000124.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Determination of the endothelial cell density (ECD) by eye banks is paramount in donor cornea qualification. Unbiased measurement avoids wastage and grafts with an increased risk of premature failure. Internal calibration of the counting method is essential, but external validation would add an extra stage in the assessment of reliability. In this respect, data published by the multicenter Cornea Donor Study (CDS) in 2005 is a reference. The aim of the study was to compare ECD determined within a single eye bank, which uses calibrated image analysis software designed for transmitted light microscopy images of organ cultured corneas, with the CDS data determined on specular microscopy images of corneas stored at 4°C.

METHODS

ECD of consecutive corneas retrieved between 2005 and 2013 was determined after exposure to 0.9% NaCl. More than 300 ECs were counted on 3 fields of the central 8 mm. Endothelial cell boundaries were automatically drawn and verified by a skilled technician who performed all necessary corrections.

RESULTS

Three thousand fifty-two corneas were analyzed, of which 48.5% donors were >75 years (CDS upper age limit). Between 10 and 75 years, the ECD varied according to donor age exactly in the same manner as in the CDS, but were consistently higher of 100 ± 25 cells per square millimeter (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ECD determined by a computer-aided method from transmitted light microscopy images compares favorably with the American CDS reference series. The slight systematic difference on either side of the Atlantic Ocean could be due to (1) differences in counting principles and/or (2) higher shrinkage of the cornea caused by stromal edema in organ culture.

摘要

目的

通过眼库确定内皮细胞密度(ECD)对于供体角膜的质量评估至关重要。这种无偏的测量方法可以避免浪费,并降低移植物早期失效的风险。计数方法的内部校准是必要的,但外部验证将在可靠性评估中增加一个额外的阶段。在这方面,2005 年发表的多中心角膜供体研究(CDS)的数据是一个参考。该研究的目的是比较在单个眼库中使用经校准的图像分析软件对器官培养角膜的透射光显微镜图像进行的 ECD 测量,与 CDS 数据对 4°C 储存的角膜反射光显微镜图像进行的测量。

方法

对 2005 年至 2013 年间连续回收的角膜在暴露于 0.9%氯化钠后进行 ECD 测定。在中央 8 毫米的 3 个视野中计数超过 300 个 EC。内皮细胞边界由一位熟练的技术员自动绘制,并进行所有必要的校正。

结果

共分析了 3052 个角膜,其中 48.5%的供体年龄大于 75 岁(CDS 的最高年龄限制)。在 10 至 75 岁之间,ECD 随供体年龄而变化,与 CDS 完全相同,但每平方毫米始终高 100±25 个细胞(P<0.001)。

结论

从透射光显微镜图像中通过计算机辅助方法确定的 ECD 与美国 CDS 参考系列相比具有良好的可比性。大西洋两岸的这种轻微的系统差异可能归因于:(1)计数原理的差异,和/或(2)器官培养中基质水肿引起的角膜收缩率较高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验