Suppr超能文献

探讨临床伦理顾问的问责制:实践与培训意义。

Exploring accountability of clinical ethics consultants: practice and training implications.

机构信息

a Cleveland Clinic.

出版信息

Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(6):34-41. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.900140.

Abstract

Clinical ethics consultants represent a multidisciplinary group of scholars and practitioners with varied training backgrounds, who are integrated into a medical environment to assist in the provision of ethically supportable care. Little has been written about the degree to which such consultants are accountable for the patient care outcome of the advice given. We propose a model for examining degrees of internally motivated accountability that range from restricted to unbounded accountability, and support balanced accountability as a goal for practice. Finally, we explore implications of this model for training of clinical ethics consultants from diverse academic backgrounds, including those disciplines that do not have a formal code of ethics relating to clinical practice.

摘要

临床伦理顾问是一个由多学科学者和从业者组成的团队,他们拥有不同的培训背景,融入医疗环境中,为提供符合伦理的支持性医疗服务提供帮助。对于临床伦理顾问对其提出的建议在多大程度上对患者的护理结果负责,目前的研究还很少。我们提出了一个检查内在动机责任程度的模型,范围从有限责任到无限制责任,并支持平衡责任作为实践的目标。最后,我们探讨了该模型对来自不同学术背景的临床伦理顾问培训的影响,包括那些与临床实践没有正式道德规范的学科。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验