Ji Linong, Lu Juming, Weng Jianping, Jia Weiping, Tian Haoming, Zhu Dalong, Xing Xiaoping, Guo Lixin
Department of Endocrinology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
J Diabetes. 2015 Mar;7(2):166-73. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12165. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
The aim of the present study was to investigate the current status of oral anti-diabetic drug (OAD) therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and influencing factors in a real-world setting in China.
A total of 9872 outpatients with type 2 diabetes, who had received OADs (monotherapy or combination therapy) for at least 3 months were recruited in this study. Current antidiabetic treatment regimen and related clinical data were collected from medical records and analyzed.
The most common OADs in use were insulin secretagogues (70.2%) such as sulfonylureas (SUs; 42.7%) or glinides (27.5%), followed by metformin (53.7%), α-glucosidase inhibitors (35.9%), thiazolidinediones (17.2%), and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (0.8%). Dual-drug combination therapy was more common (45.4%) than monotherapy (35.8%) and combination therapy with at least three drugs (17.0%). Patients on SU or glinide monotherapy were more likely to alter their treatment frequently (odds ratio [OR], 1.7; 95% CI, 1.38-2.08; P < 0.001).
The status of OAD use in China is varied with a majority of the patients altering their treatment regimen citing poor effectiveness. These observations from a real-world setting may serve as guidance for improving diabetes management in China.
本研究旨在调查中国2型糖尿病患者口服抗糖尿病药物(OAD)治疗的现状及影响因素。
本研究共纳入9872例接受OAD(单药治疗或联合治疗)至少3个月的2型糖尿病门诊患者。从病历中收集当前的抗糖尿病治疗方案及相关临床数据并进行分析。
最常用的OAD是胰岛素促泌剂(70.2%),如磺脲类药物(SUs;42.7%)或格列奈类药物(27.5%),其次是二甲双胍(53.7%)、α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂(35.9%)、噻唑烷二酮类药物(17.2%)和二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂(0.8%)。双药联合治疗(45.4%)比单药治疗(35.8%)和至少三种药物的联合治疗(17.0%)更常见。接受SU或格列奈类单药治疗的患者更有可能频繁改变治疗方案(优势比[OR],1.7;95%置信区间,1.38 - 2.08;P < 0.001)。
中国OAD的使用情况各不相同,大多数患者因疗效不佳而改变治疗方案。这些来自真实世界的观察结果可为改善中国的糖尿病管理提供指导。