Erkkola-Anttinen Nora, Tähtinen Paula A, Laine Miia K, Ruohola Aino
Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland; City of Turku Welfare Division, Primary Healthcare Services, Turku, Finland.
Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jul;78(7):1036-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.03.035. Epub 2014 Apr 12.
Tympanometry can be used to detect middle ear effusion (MEE). As the need for rearrangement of clinical resources at the primary care level increases, it is important to determine whether layman parents could be taught to use the tympanometer reliably, aiming to reduce unnecessary physician visits during respiratory tract infections.
From our AOM treatment trial we enrolled 78 children (age 6-35 months) who had persistent MEE, parents were voluntary and willing to use a tympanometer at home, the child was sufficiently co-operative, and parents learned technically the use of the tympanometer. At home, parents were asked to perform daily bilateral tympanometry on their child. We included those parental tympanometric examinations, to which the corresponding tympanometric examination, within one day by a study physician was available. Parental tympanometric examinations were compared to the pneumatic otoscopy by a study physician which served as the diagnostic standard.
This study involved 78 children and a total of 432 parental tympanometric examinations. From these 432 examinations, parents obtained an interpretable tympanogram in 83% (359/432) and physicians in 91% (393/432) (absolute rate difference 8%, 95% CI 3-12%). Both obtained an interpretable tympanogram from the same ear in 75% (326/432) of the tympanometric examinations. Of these 326 interpretable examinations, parents and physicians were in accordance with either a peaked or a flat tympanogram in 88% of examinations (288/326) (kappa-value 0.77). When the tympanogram was peaked, pneumatic otoscopy indicated healthy middle ear in 72% (122/169) of parental and in 69% (149/217) of study physicians' tympanometric examinations (absolute rate difference 4%, 95% CI -6% to 13%). When the tympanogram was flat, pneumatic otoscopy indicated any MEE in 92% of parental (174/190) and in 96% (169/176) of study physicians' tympanometric examinations (absolute rate difference 4%, 95% CI -9% to 1%).
This study showed that layman parents are able to use tympanometry technically successfully, and that the parental tympanometric examinations are as reliable as those obtained by study physicians.
鼓室导抗图可用于检测中耳积液(MEE)。随着基层医疗层面临床资源重新配置需求的增加,确定外行人父母是否能够被教会可靠地使用鼓室导抗仪很重要,目的是减少呼吸道感染期间不必要的医生就诊。
从我们的急性中耳炎治疗试验中,我们招募了78名患有持续性中耳积液的儿童(年龄6 - 35个月),其父母自愿且愿意在家中使用鼓室导抗仪,孩子足够配合,并且父母从技术上学会了鼓室导抗仪的使用方法。在家中,要求父母每天对孩子进行双侧鼓室导抗测试。我们纳入了那些父母进行的鼓室导抗检查,且研究医生在一天内对相应耳朵进行了鼓室导抗检查。将父母的鼓室导抗检查结果与研究医生进行的耳气压镜检查结果进行比较,耳气压镜检查作为诊断标准。
本研究涉及78名儿童,共进行了432次父母鼓室导抗检查。在这432次检查中,父母获得可解读鼓室导抗图的比例为83%(359/432),医生为91%(393/432)(绝对率差8%,95%可信区间3 - 12%)。在75%(326/432)的鼓室导抗检查中,父母和医生从同一耳朵获得了可解读的鼓室导抗图。在这326次可解读的检查中,父母和医生在88%的检查(288/326)中对尖峰型或平坦型鼓室导抗图的判断一致(kappa值0.77)。当鼓室导抗图为尖峰型时,耳气压镜检查显示72%(122/169)的父母鼓室导抗检查和69%(149/217)的研究医生鼓室导抗检查中耳健康(绝对率差4%,95%可信区间 - 6%至13%)。当鼓室导抗图为平坦型时,耳气压镜检查显示92%的父母鼓室导抗检查(174/190)和96%的研究医生鼓室导抗检查(169/176)中有任何中耳积液(绝对率差4%,95%可信区间 - 9%至1%)。
本研究表明外行人父母能够在技术上成功使用鼓室导抗仪,并且父母进行的鼓室导抗检查与研究医生进行的检查一样可靠。