Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee WI 53201-3022, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53201-3022, USA; Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee WI 53201-1997, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee WI 53201-3022, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53201-3022, USA; Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee WI 53201-1997, USA.
J Clin Anesth. 2014 May;26(3):204-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.10.015. Epub 2014 May 5.
To evaluate whether conversion from aprotinin to epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) during infant cardiac surgery was associated with increased perioperative bleeding.
Structured retrospective chart review.
University-affiliated large congenital cardiac surgery program.
Records from 145 infants (age < 1 yr) receiving aprotinin as antifibrinolytic therapy for cardiac surgery between 6/1/2006 and 12/31/2006 were compared with a cohort of infants receiving EACA for cardiac surgery between 6/1/2008 and 12/31/2008. Sixty-eight infants received aprotinin and 77 infants received EACA. Measured indicators of perioperative bleeding included transfusion volumes, recombinant activated clotting factor VIIa (rFVIIa) administration, need for reexploration, and perioperative chest tube output.
EACA treated patients received significantly more rFVIIa for uncontrolled bleeding (19/77 [25%] vs 3/68 [4%]; P < 0.001) and required surgical reexploration more frequently (21/77 [27%] vs 7/68 [10%]; P = 0.01]. Median (25th-75th percentiles) intraoperative platelet transfusion requirements were also increased after the switch to EACA (28 mL [0-58 mL] vs 0 mL [0 mL - 34.5 mL]), but this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.06).
Bleeding in infant cardiac surgery increased following the change in antifibrinolytic therapy from aprotinin to EACA. Given the potential for major harm, especially thrombotic complications, from rFVIIa use, prospective studies examining the safety of postcardiopulmonary bypass rFVIIa administration in infants are necessary before the routine off-label use may be recommended.
评估婴儿心脏手术期间从抑肽酶转换为ε-氨基己酸(EACA)是否与围手术期出血增加相关。
结构回顾性图表审查。
大学附属大型先天性心脏手术项目。
比较了 2006 年 6 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间接受抑肽酶作为心脏手术抗纤维蛋白溶解治疗的 145 名婴儿(<1 岁)的记录,以及 2008 年 6 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间接受 EACA 治疗的心脏手术婴儿的队列。68 名婴儿接受抑肽酶,77 名婴儿接受 EACA。围手术期出血的测量指标包括输血量、重组激活凝血因子 VIIa(rFVIIa)的给药、再次探查的需要以及围手术期胸腔引流管输出量。
EACA 治疗组患者因失控性出血接受 rFVIIa 的治疗显著更多(19/77 [25%] vs 3/68 [4%];P<0.001),且需要更频繁地进行手术再次探查(21/77 [27%] vs 7/68 [10%];P=0.01)。在转换为 EACA 后,血小板输注的中位数(25 至 75 百分位数)也增加(28 毫升[0 至 58 毫升] vs 0 毫升[0 毫升至 34.5 毫升]),但差异无统计学意义(P=0.06)。
从抑肽酶转换为 EACA 后,婴儿心脏手术的出血增加。鉴于 rFVIIa 使用可能导致严重伤害,特别是血栓并发症,在推荐常规标签外使用之前,有必要进行前瞻性研究,以检查体外循环后 rFVIIa 给药在婴儿中的安全性。