Manns Patricia J, Norton Amy V, Darrah Johanna
P.J. Manns, PT, PhD, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, 2-50 Corbett Hall, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2G4 Canada.
A.V. Norton, MA, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta.
Phys Ther. 2015 Apr;95(4):568-78. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130450. Epub 2014 May 8.
Curricula changes in physical therapist education programs in Canada emphasize evidence-based practice skills, including literature retrieval and evaluation. Do graduates use these skills in practice?
The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of research information in the clinical decision making of therapists with different years of experience and evidence-based practice preparation. Perceptions about evidence-based practice were explored qualitatively.
A cross-sectional study with 4 graduating cohorts was conducted.
Eighty physical therapists representing 4 different graduating cohorts participated in interviews focused on 2 clinical scenarios. Participants had varying years of clinical experience (range=1-15 years) and academic knowledge of evidence-based practice skills. Therapists discussed the effectiveness of interventions related to the scenarios and identified the sources of information used to reach decisions. Participants also answered general questions related to evidence-based practice knowledge.
Recent graduates demonstrated better knowledge of evidence-based practice skills compared with therapists with 6 to 15 years of clinical experience. However, all groups used clinical experience most frequently as their source of information for clinical decisions. Research evidence was infrequently included in decision making.
This study used a convenience sample of therapists who agreed to volunteer for the study.
The results suggest a knowledge-to-practice gap; graduates are not using the new skills to inform their practice. Tailoring academic evidence-based activities more to the time constraints of clinical practice may help students to be more successful in applying evidence in practice. Academic programs need to do more to create and nurture environments in both academic and clinical settings to ensure students practice using evidence-based practice skills across settings.
加拿大物理治疗师教育项目的课程改革强调循证实践技能,包括文献检索和评估。毕业生在实践中会运用这些技能吗?
本研究旨在评估不同经验年限和循证实践准备程度的治疗师在临床决策中对研究信息的运用情况。对循证实践的认知进行了定性探索。
对4个毕业队列进行了横断面研究。
80名代表4个不同毕业队列的物理治疗师参与了针对2个临床案例的访谈。参与者的临床经验年限不同(范围为1 - 15年),且对循证实践技能有不同的学术知识水平。治疗师们讨论了与案例相关的干预措施的有效性,并确定了用于做出决策的信息来源。参与者还回答了与循证实践知识相关的一般性问题。
与有6至15年临床经验的治疗师相比,应届毕业生对循证实践技能的了解更好。然而,所有组在临床决策中最常将临床经验作为信息来源。研究证据很少被纳入决策过程。
本研究使用了同意自愿参与研究的治疗师的便利样本。
结果表明存在知识与实践之间的差距;毕业生未将新技能应用于实践。使学术性循证活动更贴合临床实践的时间限制,可能有助于学生在实践中更成功地应用证据。学术项目需要做更多工作,在学术和临床环境中营造并培育相应氛围,以确保学生在不同环境中都能运用循证实践技能进行实践。