Guo Gao-Xuan, Li Yu, Xu Liang, Li Zhi-Ping, Yang Qing, Xu Miao-Juan
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2014 Feb;35(2):562-8.
Firstly, advances in investigation and evaluation of groundwater pollution in China in the last decade were presented, and several issues in the field which hinder the development of groundwater environment were pointed out. Then, four key concepts in risk assessment of groundwater pollution were briefly described with more emphasis on the difference between groundwater pollution assessment and groundwater quality assessment in this paper. After that, a method on risk assessment of groundwater pollution which included four indicators, the pollution assessment, the quality assessment, the vulnerability and the pollution load of groundwater, was presented based on the regional characteristics of Beijing Plain. Also, AHP and expert scoring method were applied to determine the weight of the four evaluation factors. Finally, the application of this method in Beijing Plain showed the area with high, relative high, medium, relative low and low risk of groundwater contamination was 1 232.1 km2, 699.3 km2, 1 951.4 km, 2 644 km2, and 133.2 km2, respectively. The study results showed that the higher risk in the western region was likely caused by the higher pollution load and its higher vulnerability, while the relatively high risk in the southeast of Beijing plain area, the Tongzhou District, is mainly caused by historical pollution sources.
首先,介绍了中国近十年来地下水污染调查与评价的进展,并指出了该领域中阻碍地下水环境发展的若干问题。然后,简要描述了地下水污染风险评估中的四个关键概念,本文更侧重于地下水污染评估与地下水质量评估之间的差异。之后,基于北京平原的区域特征,提出了一种地下水污染风险评估方法,该方法包括污染评估、质量评估、脆弱性和地下水污染负荷四个指标。此外,运用层次分析法和专家评分法确定了四个评价因子的权重。最后,该方法在北京平原的应用结果表明,地下水污染高风险区、较高风险区、中风险区、较低风险区和低风险区的面积分别为1232.1平方公里、699.3平方公里、1951.4平方公里、2644平方公里和133.2平方公里。研究结果表明,西部地区较高的风险可能是由较高的污染负荷及其较高的脆弱性造成的,而北京平原东南部通州区相对较高的风险主要是由历史污染源造成的。