Department of Rehabilitation Science, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Sep;95(9):1759-75. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.03.034. Epub 2014 May 9.
To systematically review the psychometric evidence on the 2-minute walk test (2MWT).
Electronic searches of databases including MEDLINE, CINAHL, Academic Search Premier, SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and DARE were done until February 2014 using a combination of subject headings and free texts.
Studies were included if psychometric properties of the 2MWT were (1) evaluated; (2) written as full reports; and (3) published in English language peer-reviewed journals.
A modified consensus-based standard for the selection of health measurement instruments checklist was used to rate the methodological quality of the included studies. A quality assessment for statistical outcomes was used to assess the measurement properties of the 2MWT.
Best-evidence synthesis was collated from 25 studies of 14 patient groups. Only 1 study was found that examined the 2MWT in the pediatric population. The testing procedures of the 2MWT varied across the included studies. Reliability, validity (construct and criterion), and responsiveness of the 2MWT also varied across different patient groups. Moderate to strong evidence was found for reliability, convergent validity, discriminative validity, and responsiveness of the 2MWT in frail elderly patients. Moderate to strong evidence for reliability, convergent validity, and responsiveness was found in adults with lower limb amputations. Moderate to strong evidence for validity (convergent and discriminative) was found in adults who received rehabilitation after hip fractures or cardiac surgery. Limited evidence for the psychometric properties of the 2MWT was found in other population groups because of methodological flaws.
There is inadequate breadth and depth of psychometric evidence of the 2MWT for clinical and research purposes-specifically, minimal clinically important changes and responsiveness. More good-quality studies are needed, especially in the pediatric population. Consensus on standardized testing procedures of the 2MWT is also required.
系统评价 2 分钟步行试验(2MWT)的心理测量学证据。
电子检索包括 MEDLINE、CINAHL、Academic Search Premier、SPORTDiscus、PsycINFO、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆和 DARE 在内的数据库,检索时间截至 2014 年 2 月,使用主题词和自由文本的组合。
如果 2MWT 的心理测量学特性(1)得到评估;(2)以完整报告的形式书写;(3)发表在英语同行评议期刊上,则纳入研究。
使用改良的基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准检查表来评估纳入研究的方法学质量。使用统计结果质量评估来评估 2MWT 的测量特性。
从 14 个患者组的 25 项研究中整理出最佳证据综合。仅发现 1 项研究检查了儿科人群中的 2MWT。纳入研究中 2MWT 的测试程序各不相同。不同患者组的 2MWT 可靠性、有效性(构念和标准)和反应性也各不相同。在体弱老年人中,2MWT 的可靠性、收敛有效性、判别有效性和反应性得到了中等至强有力的证据支持。在下肢截肢患者中,2MWT 的可靠性、收敛有效性和反应性得到了中等至强有力的证据支持。在接受髋关节骨折或心脏手术后康复的成年人中,2MWT 的有效性(收敛和判别)得到了中等至强有力的证据支持。由于方法学上的缺陷,在其他人群中,2MWT 的心理测量学特性的证据有限。
2MWT 的心理测量学证据在临床和研究方面不够广泛和深入-特别是,最小临床重要变化和反应性。需要更多高质量的研究,特别是在儿科人群中。还需要对 2MWT 的标准化测试程序达成共识。