Department of Pediatrics, Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, U.S.A.
Neuroscience Institute, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, U.S.A.
Epilepsia. 2014 May;55(5):629-632. doi: 10.1111/epi.12569. Epub 2014 May 9.
The question we address here is whether the invasive presurgical brain mapping approaches of direct cortical stimulation and of the Wada procedure can be replaced by noninvasive functional neuroimaging methods (functional magnetic resonance imaging [fMRI], magnetoencephalography [MEG], transcranial magnetic stimulation and [TMS]). First, we outline the reasons for contemplating such a replacement. Second, we present evidence to the effect that the efficacy of the invasive and noninvasive methods, while suboptimal, is comparable. Third, we discuss additional advantages of noninvasive presurgical brain mapping and conclude that there are no longer compelling reasons for opting for invasive mapping in many if not most cases provided that the non-invasive methods are available.
我们在这里要讨论的问题是,直接皮质刺激和 Wada 手术等侵袭性术前脑图绘制方法是否可以被非侵入性的功能神经影像学方法(功能磁共振成像 [fMRI]、脑磁图 [MEG]、经颅磁刺激和 [TMS])所取代。首先,我们概述了考虑这种替代方法的原因。其次,我们提出了证据表明,侵袭性和非侵袭性方法的疗效虽然并不理想,但具有可比性。第三,我们讨论了非侵袭性术前脑图绘制的额外优势,并得出结论,只要非侵入性方法可用,在许多情况下(如果不是大多数情况),选择侵袭性映射的理由已经不再充分。