van der Eijk A C, van der Plas A J, van der Palen C J N M, Dankelman J, Smit B J
Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime & Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands Department of Neonatology, Erasmus MC, Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Technology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2014;7(1):55-64. doi: 10.3233/NPM-1475213.
In multi-infusion IV therapy, the actual volume delivered to the neonate can vary over time. To reduce flow rate variability, check valves can be used. A check valve allows flow through the valve in only one direction.
To evaluate flow rate variability in a low flow dual-infusion setup with and without check valves.
The effect of changing the height of and adding syringes to the IV-administration set was tested with and without check valves in an in vitro dual-infusion setup with in-line flow meters. The pre-programmed flow rates were 2.5 and 0.1 ml/h.
Twenty-four tests of 90 minutes were performed. Time to reach 75% of the pre-programmed 0.1 ml/h flow rate was >20 minutes. The highest total delivered volume during a test was (mean ± SD) 56 ± 8% of the expected delivery for tests without check valves, and diminished to 12 ± 24% of the expected delivery for check valves with a higher opening pressure.
The actual flows and the total delivered volume in low flow dual-infusion setups are less than expected on the pre-programmed flow-rate. These findings emphasize the need for the development of more accurate delivery systems for drugs and fluids in neonatology. Caregivers should be aware of these findings, and optimise the delivery of IV substances by making use of check valves with low opening pressures and by minimising compliance and volume of the IV-administration set. Furthermore, changes in the relative height between pumps and catheter tip should be minimized.
在多次输注静脉治疗中,输送给新生儿的实际液体量可能随时间变化。为降低流速变异性,可使用止回阀。止回阀只允许液体沿一个方向通过阀门。
评估在有和没有止回阀的低流量双输注装置中的流速变异性。
在带有在线流量计的体外双输注装置中,测试了在有和没有止回阀的情况下,改变静脉输液装置的高度和添加注射器的影响。预编程流速为2.5和0.1毫升/小时。
进行了24次90分钟的测试。达到预编程的0.1毫升/小时流速的75%所需时间超过20分钟。在一次测试中,无止回阀测试的最高总输送量为预期输送量的(平均值±标准差)56±8%,而对于开启压力较高的止回阀,该值降至预期输送量的12±24%。
低流量双输注装置中的实际流速和总输送量低于预编程流速时的预期值。这些发现强调了在新生儿科开发更精确的药物和液体输送系统的必要性。护理人员应了解这些发现,并通过使用开启压力低的止回阀、最小化静脉输液装置的顺应性和体积来优化静脉给药。此外,应尽量减少泵与导管尖端之间相对高度的变化。