Lee Kyung Tai, Park Young Uk, Jegal Hyuk, Roh Young Tae, Kim Jin Su, Yoon Ji Sang
Foot and Ankle Service, KT Lee's Orthopedic Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Orthop Sci. 2014 Jul;19(4):546-51. doi: 10.1007/s00776-014-0576-5. Epub 2014 May 10.
The use of regional anesthesia, such as ankle block or sciatic nerve block, has gained in popularity due to considerations of patient comfort and safety in foot and ankle surgery. However, if the operation extends above the midfoot or if a thigh tourniquet is required, general or spinal anesthesia is needed. The authors aimed to determine by prospective study whether a 'double block', involving femoral and sciatic nerve blocks, is advantageous under such conditions.
The effectiveness of a preoperative double block was prospectively evaluated in 26 consecutive patients undergoing a variety of foot and ankle procedures, compared with 32 patients with sciatic nerve block alone. Time of analgesia onset, length of block coverage, and complications were noted. Degree of pain was measured using VAS (Visual Analog Scale) scores at the operation, just after surgery, and at 2 h, 1 day, and 2 days after surgery.
The surgical procedures performed under double block were ankle arthroscopy and medial ankle ligament reconstruction, and Achilles tendon repair, and the following conditions were treated; surgery for medial ankle fracture, ankle fusion, subtalar fusion, and surgery for hindfoot diseases, such as, talocalcaneal coalition. The average time required to analgesia onset was 63 min for a double block and 61 min for sciatic nerve block alone. Analgesia time lasted 12.0 h for a double block and 12.4 h for sciatic nerve block alone. Average VAS scores at the operation and immediately after the operation were 0.03 (range 0-1) and 0.16 (range 0-2) for sciatic nerve block, and 0.35 (range, 0-4), 0.31 (range 0-2) for double block. Average VAS scores at 2 h, 1 day, and 2 days postoperatively were 0.28 (range, 0-2), 2.16 (range 0-6), and 1.63 (range 0-5) for sciatic nerve block, and 0.42 (range 0-5), 2.27 (range 0-7), and 1.72 (range 0-8), respectively, for double block.
The results of this prospective study suggest that double block provides good surgical anesthesia and good postoperative pain control for hindfoot and ankle surgery.
由于考虑到足部和踝关节手术中患者的舒适度和安全性,区域麻醉如踝关节阻滞或坐骨神经阻滞的应用越来越普遍。然而,如果手术范围超过中足或需要使用大腿止血带,则需要全身麻醉或脊髓麻醉。作者旨在通过前瞻性研究确定在这种情况下,涉及股神经和坐骨神经阻滞的“双重阻滞”是否具有优势。
前瞻性评估了26例连续接受各种足部和踝关节手术患者术前双重阻滞的有效性,并与32例仅接受坐骨神经阻滞的患者进行比较。记录镇痛起效时间、阻滞覆盖时长及并发症情况。在手术时、术后即刻、术后2小时、1天和2天,使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)测量疼痛程度。
在双重阻滞下进行的手术包括踝关节镜检查、内侧踝关节韧带重建和跟腱修复,以及以下病症的治疗;内侧踝关节骨折手术、踝关节融合术、距下关节融合术以及后足疾病手术,如距跟联合。双重阻滞的平均镇痛起效时间为63分钟,单纯坐骨神经阻滞为61分钟。双重阻滞的镇痛时间持续12.0小时,单纯坐骨神经阻滞为12.4小时。坐骨神经阻滞在手术时及术后即刻的平均VAS评分为0.03(范围0 - 1)和0.16(范围0 - 2),双重阻滞为0.35(范围0 - 4)、0.31(范围0 - 2)。坐骨神经阻滞术后2小时、1天和2天的平均VAS评分分别为0.28(范围0 - 2)、2.16(范围0 - 6)和1.63(范围0 - 5),双重阻滞分别为0.42(范围0 - 5)、2.27(范围0 - 7)和1.72(范围0 - 8)。
这项前瞻性研究结果表明,双重阻滞为后足和踝关节手术提供了良好的手术麻醉和术后疼痛控制。