Suppr超能文献

股神经联合坐骨神经阻滞与全身麻醉对糖尿病足患者血流动力学稳定性及术后并发症影响的比较:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验

Comparison of the Effects of Combined Femoral and Sciatic Nerves Block versus General Anesthesia on Hemodynamic Stability and Postoperative Complication in Patients with Diabetic Foot: A Prospective, Double-Blind and Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Zou Liyun, Wei Qiufeng, Pan Sining, Xiao Fei, Jiang Yage, Zhong Yu, Xie Yubo

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, People's Republic of China.

Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2024 Jun 5;17:2243-2257. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S465814. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Perioperative anesthetic management of patients with diabetic foot undergoing surgical treatment is challenging due to their poor cardiovascular health status. According to previous literature, general anesthesia and peripheral nerve block have their own advantages and disadvantages for such patients. We reported the effect of these two anesthesia techniques on perioperative hemodynamics and prognosis in these patients.

METHODS

This study employed a prospective randomized controlled design, where patients meeting the inclusion criteria were assigned to two groups: the general anesthesia group (GA group) and the peripheral nerve block group (PNB group). The primary outcomes were the differences in intraoperative hemodynamic stability and the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups. The second outcomes were postoperative numerical rating scale scores, analgesic drug remedies, postoperative sleep conditions monitored by sleep bracelets and health status assessed by EQ-5D-5 L scores.

RESULTS

One hundred and nine subjects were enrolled in this study, including 54 in the GA group and 55 in the PNB group. The baseline parameters of the two groups were comparable. The GA group exhibited a significantly higher incidence of hypotension, and Colloid intake and total fluid intake were significantly higher in the GA group than in the PNB group. Additionally, a larger proportion of patients in the GA group. The scores of postoperative pain during the 48 hours after surgery were significantly higher, and more patients needed tramadol for postoperative analgesia during the 24 h after surgery in the GA group than in the PNB group. Patients in the PNB group slept better, first feeding time, earlier out-of-bed activity and earlier discharge from the hospital, compared to the GA group. However, there was no obvious difference in postoperative complications between the two groups except pharyngeal pain.

CONCLUSION

Peripheral nerve block is a better option in patients with diabetes undergoing elective below-knee surgery than general anesthesia.

摘要

背景

糖尿病足患者手术治疗的围手术期麻醉管理具有挑战性,因为他们的心血管健康状况较差。根据以往文献,全身麻醉和外周神经阻滞对此类患者各有优缺点。我们报告了这两种麻醉技术对这些患者围手术期血流动力学和预后的影响。

方法

本研究采用前瞻性随机对照设计,将符合纳入标准的患者分为两组:全身麻醉组(GA组)和外周神经阻滞组(PNB组)。主要结局是两组术中血流动力学稳定性的差异和术后并发症的发生率。次要结局是术后数字评定量表评分、镇痛药补救措施、通过睡眠手环监测的术后睡眠状况以及通过EQ-5D-5L评分评估的健康状况。

结果

本研究共纳入109名受试者,其中GA组54名,PNB组55名。两组的基线参数具有可比性。GA组低血压发生率显著更高,GA组的胶体摄入量和总液体摄入量显著高于PNB组。此外,GA组中有更大比例的患者。术后48小时内的术后疼痛评分显著更高,GA组术后24小时内需要曲马多进行术后镇痛的患者比PNB组更多。与GA组相比,PNB组患者睡眠更好,首次进食时间更早,下床活动更早,出院更早。然而,除咽痛外,两组术后并发症无明显差异。

结论

对于接受择期膝下手术的糖尿病患者,外周神经阻滞是比全身麻醉更好的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3092/11162629/e09f9d64cd73/DMSO-17-2243-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验