Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Br J Surg. 2014 Jul;101(8):949-58. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9530. Epub 2014 May 15.
This population-based study aimed to evaluate trends in surgical approach for screen-detected cancer versus interval breast cancer, and to determine the factors associated with positive resection margins.
Screening mammograms of women aged 50-75 years, who underwent biennial screening in a Dutch breast-screening region between 1997 and 2011, were included. Patient and tumour characteristics were compared between women who underwent mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for screen-detected or interval cancer, and women with a negative or positive resection margin after BCS.
Some 417,013 consecutive screening mammograms were included. A total of 2224 screen-detected and 825 interval cancers were diagnosed. The BCS rate remained stable (mean 6.1 per 1000 screened women; P = 0.099), whereas mastectomy rates increased significantly during the study from 0.9 (1997-1998) to 1.9 (2009-2010) per 1000 screened women (P < 0.001). The proportion of positive resection margins for invasive cancer was 19.6 and 7.6 per cent in 1997-1998 and 2009-2010 respectively (P < 0.001), with significant variation between hospitals. Dense breasts, preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, microcalcifications, architectural distortion, tumour size over 20 mm, axillary lymph node metastasis and treating hospital were independent risk factors for mastectomy. Interval cancer, image-guided tumour localization, microcalcifications, breast parenchyma asymmetry, tumour size greater than 20 mm, lobular tumour histology, low tumour grade, extensive invasive component and treating hospital were independent risk factors for positive resection margins.
Mastectomy rates doubled during a 14-year period of screening mammography and the proportion of positive resection margins decreased, with variation among hospitals. The latter observation stresses the importance of quality control programmes for hospitals treating women with breast cancer.
本研究旨在评估筛查性乳腺癌和间隔期乳腺癌的手术方式趋势,并确定与阳性切缘相关的因素。
纳入了在 1997 年至 2011 年期间参加荷兰乳腺筛查项目的年龄在 50-75 岁之间的女性进行的每年两次的筛查性乳房 X 光检查的资料。比较了因筛查性或间隔期乳腺癌而行乳房切除术或保乳手术(BCS)的女性、以及 BCS 后切缘阳性的女性与切缘阴性的女性的患者和肿瘤特征。
共纳入 417013 例连续的筛查性乳房 X 光检查资料。共诊断出 2224 例筛查性乳腺癌和 825 例间隔期乳腺癌。BCS 率保持稳定(每 1000 名筛查女性中有 6.1 例;P=0.099),而在研究期间,乳房切除术率从 1997-1998 年的 0.9 例(每 1000 名筛查女性)增加到 2009-2010 年的 1.9 例(每 1000 名筛查女性)(P<0.001)。1997-1998 年和 2009-2010 年浸润性癌的阳性切缘比例分别为 19.6%和 7.6%(P<0.001),不同医院之间存在显著差异。致密乳房、术前磁共振成像、微钙化、结构扭曲、肿瘤大小>20mm、腋窝淋巴结转移和治疗医院是乳房切除术的独立危险因素。间隔期乳腺癌、影像引导肿瘤定位、微钙化、乳腺实质不对称、肿瘤大小>20mm、小叶状肿瘤组织学、低肿瘤分级、广泛浸润成分和治疗医院是阳性切缘的独立危险因素。
在 14 年的筛查性乳房 X 光检查期间,乳房切除术率增加了一倍,而阳性切缘的比例降低了,不同医院之间存在差异。后一种观察结果强调了为治疗乳腺癌的女性制定医院质量控制方案的重要性。