Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, 5602 ZA, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Int J Cancer. 2012 Jan 1;130(1):122-8. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25984. Epub 2011 May 9.
Few data are available on the effect of previous benign breast surgery on screening mammography accuracy. We determined whether sensitivity of screening mammography and tumor characteristics are different for women with and without previous benign breast surgery. We included a consecutive series of 317,398 screening mammograms of women screened between 1997 and 2008. During 2-year follow-up, clinical data, breast imaging, biopsy and surgery reports were collected from women with screen-detected or interval breast cancers. Screening sensitivity, tumor biology and tumor stages were compared between 168 women with breast cancer and prior ipsilateral benign breast surgery and 2,039 women with breast cancer but without previous ipsilateral, benign breast surgery. The sensitivity of screening mammography was significantly lower for women with prior surgery [64.3% (108/168) versus 73.4% (1,496/2,039), p = 0.01]. The concomitant increased interval cancer risk remained significant after logistic regression adjustment for age and breast density (OR = 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1-2.1). Comparing screen-detected cancers in women with and without prior breast surgery, no significant differences in estrogen receptor status (p = 0.56), mitotic activity (p = 0.17), proportions of large (T2+) tumors (p = 0.6) or lymph node positive tumors (p = 0.4) were found. Also for interval cancers, no differences were found in estrogen receptor status (p = 0.41), mitotic activity (p = 0.39), proportions of large tumors (p = 0.9) and lymph node positive tumors (p = 0.5) between women with and without prior breast surgery. We conclude that sensitivity of screening mammography is significantly lower in women with previous benign breast surgery than without, but tumor characteristics are comparable both for screen detected cancers and interval cancers.
先前良性乳腺手术对筛查性乳房 X 线摄影术准确性的影响的数据有限。我们旨在确定先前良性乳腺手术的妇女的筛查性乳房 X 线摄影术的敏感性和肿瘤特征是否与无先前良性乳腺手术的妇女不同。我们纳入了 1997 年至 2008 年期间筛查的 317398 例连续系列筛查性乳房 X 线摄影术的女性。在 2 年的随访期间,从筛查出或间隔期乳腺癌的女性中收集了临床数据、乳房影像学、活检和手术报告。在有先前同侧良性乳腺手术的 168 例乳腺癌女性和无先前同侧良性乳腺手术的 2039 例乳腺癌女性之间比较了筛查敏感性、肿瘤生物学和肿瘤分期。先前手术的女性的筛查敏感性明显较低[64.3%(108/168)比 73.4%(1496/2039),p = 0.01]。即使在调整年龄和乳房密度后进行逻辑回归,间隔期癌症风险的增加仍然显著(OR = 1.5,95%CI:1.1-2.1)。比较有和无先前乳腺手术的女性的筛查出的癌症,在雌激素受体状态(p = 0.56)、有丝分裂活性(p = 0.17)、大肿瘤(T2+)比例(p = 0.6)或淋巴结阳性肿瘤(p = 0.4)方面无显著差异。对于间隔期癌症,在雌激素受体状态(p = 0.41)、有丝分裂活性(p = 0.39)、大肿瘤比例(p = 0.9)和淋巴结阳性肿瘤(p = 0.5)方面,有和无先前乳腺手术的女性之间也无差异。我们的结论是,与无先前良性乳腺手术的女性相比,先前良性乳腺手术的女性的筛查性乳房 X 线摄影术的敏感性明显较低,但肿瘤特征对于筛查出的癌症和间隔期癌症都是可比的。