• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[ST段抬高型心肌梗死:非罪犯病变血运重建的最佳时机是什么?]

[ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: what is the best timing for revascularization of non-culprit lesions?].

作者信息

Assous B, Puymirat E

机构信息

Department of cardiology, université Paris-Descartes, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France.

Department of cardiology, université Paris-Descartes, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France; Inserm U-970, 75015 Paris, France.

出版信息

Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2014 Sep;63(4):262-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.ancard.2014.04.003
PMID:24834992
Abstract

Approximately 50% of patients admitted for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have multi-vessel disease. Current guidelines recommend revascularization of the culprit lesion only during the initial procedure except in cardiogenic shock. Benefits of revascularization of associated functional lesions are not debate. However, timing of the procedure is not clear. This article is a review over timing of secondary revascularization in STEMI patients with multi-vessels disease.

摘要

因ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)入院的患者中,约50%患有多支血管病变。目前的指南建议,除心源性休克外,仅在初次手术时对罪犯病变进行血运重建。对相关功能性病变进行血运重建的益处并无争议。然而,手术时机尚不清楚。本文是对多支血管病变的STEMI患者二次血运重建时机的综述。

相似文献

1
[ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: what is the best timing for revascularization of non-culprit lesions?].[ST段抬高型心肌梗死:非罪犯病变血运重建的最佳时机是什么?]
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2014 Sep;63(4):262-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
2
Primary PCI in STEMI--dilemmas and controversies: multivessel disease in STEMI patients. Complete versus Culprit Vessel revascularization in acute ST--elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗——困境与争议:ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的多支血管病变。急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死完全血运重建与罪犯血管血运重建。
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2011 Jun;59(3):225-33.
3
Culprit-Only vs. Complete Revascularization During ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死时仅针对罪犯血管与完全血运重建的比较
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Nov-Dec;58(3):260-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
4
Culprit only versus multivessel coronary revascularization in patients presenting with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction: unending debate.对于急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者,罪犯血管血运重建与多血管血运重建:无休止的争论。
Int J Cardiol. 2009 Sep 11;137(1):65-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.05.014. Epub 2008 Aug 1.
5
Meta-analysis of multivessel coronary artery revascularization versus culprit-only revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者行多支冠状动脉血运重建术与罪犯血管血运重建术的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 May 1;107(9):1300-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.12.039. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
6
Culprit vessel only versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel disease in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pairwise and network meta-analysis.罪犯血管血运重建与多血管病变和分期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者多血管病变的比较:一项基于成对和网络荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 9;58(7):692-703. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.046.
7
Target-vessel versus multivessel revascularisation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.ST段抬高型心肌梗死中靶血管与多支血管血运重建:随机试验的荟萃分析
Heart Lung Circ. 2015 Apr;24(4):327-34. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2014.10.013. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
8
Ischemic outcomes after coronary intervention of calcified vessels in acute coronary syndromes. Pooled analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) TRIALS.急性冠状动脉综合征中钙化病变血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的缺血结局。HORIZONS-AMI(急性心肌梗死中血管重建和支架与优化药物治疗的比较)和 ACUITY(急性冠状动脉介入治疗即刻危险分层及早期介入策略)试验的汇总分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 May 13;63(18):1845-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.034. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
9
Long-term prognosis of first myocardial infarction according to the electrocardiographic pattern (ST elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction and non-classified myocardial infarction) and revascularization procedures.根据心电图模式(ST 段抬高型心肌梗死、非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死和未分类型心肌梗死)和血运重建术对首次心肌梗死的长期预后进行评估。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Oct 15;108(8):1061-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Jul 24.
10
Clinical outcomes and predictors of unprotected left main stem culprit lesions in patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者无保护左主干罪犯病变的临床结局及预测因素
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jun 1;83(7):E243-50. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23420. Epub 2013 Nov 30.