Mukherjee Chandan, Hoeke Veronika, Stammler Anja, Bögge Hartmut, Schnack Jürgen, Glaser Thorsten
Lehrstuhl für Anorganische Chemie I, Fakultät für Chemie, Universität Bielefeld, Universitätsstr. 25, D-33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
Dalton Trans. 2014 Jul 7;43(25):9690-703. doi: 10.1039/c4dt00670d.
The chiral triplesalen ligand H6chand(RR) has been used to synthesize the chiral heptanuclear complexes {(chand(RR))Mn(III)3}2{Fe(II)(CN)6}2 ((RR)Mn(III)6Fe(II)2) and {(chand(RR))Fe(III)3}2{Fe(II)(CN)6}2 ((RR)Fe(III)6Fe(II)2), which have been characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, mass spectrometry, elemental analysis, FT-IR, Mössbauer, and UV-vis spectroscopies, electrochemistry, as well as DC and AC magnetic susceptibility measurements. The half-wave potential of the Fe(III)/Fe(II) couple in (RR)Mn(III)6Fe(II) and (RR)Fe(III)6Fe(II) is E1/2 = +0.21 and +0.75 V vs. Fc(+)/Fc, respectively, which (i) corresponds to a strong stabilization of the reduced Fe(II) species compared to the redox couple of free Fe(II/III)(CN)6 and (ii) indicates a significant difference of the electronic coupling with the {(chand(RR))M(t)}(3+) units (M(t) = Mn(III), Fe(III)). Analysis of the DC magnetic data (μeffvs. T, VTVH) of both complexes by a full-matrix diagonalization of the spin-Hamiltonian including isotropic exchange, zero-field splitting with full consideration of the relative orientation of the D tensors and Zeeman interactions reveals ferromagnetic interactions of JMn-Mn = +0.17 ± 0.02 cm(-1) with DMn = -3.4 ± 0.3 cm(-1) for (RR)Mn(III)6Fe(II) and JFe-Fe = +0.235 ± 0.005 cm(-1) with DFe = 0 for (RR)Fe(III)6Fe(II). The comparison of the molecular structures of (RR)Mn(III)6Fe(II) and (RR)Fe(III)6Fe(II) with those of the heptanuclear complexes M(t)6M(c) using the achiral triplesalen ligand (talen(t-Bu2))(6-) reveals significant differences in the ligand folding, smaller C-C bond distances in the central phloroglucinol ring and larger HOMA values. This indicates more aromatic character and less heteroradialene contribution in (RR)Mn(III)6Fe(II) and (RR)Fe(III)6Fe(II), which explains the switching from antiferromagnetic coupling in M(t)6M(c) to ferromagnetic coupling in (RR)M(t)6M(c) by a stronger contribution of the spin-polarization mechanism. This establishes a magnetostructural correlation between the structural parameters describing the aromaticity of the central phloroglucinol unit and the observed exchange couplings JMn-Mn.
手性三联水杨醛配体H6chand(RR)已被用于合成手性七核配合物{(chand(RR))Mn(III)3}2{Fe(II)(CN)6}2 ((RR)Mn(III)6Fe(II)2)和{(chand(RR))Fe(III)3}2{Fe(II)(CN)6}2 ((RR)Fe(III)6Fe(II)2),它们已通过单晶X射线衍射、质谱、元素分析、傅里叶变换红外光谱、穆斯堡尔光谱和紫外可见光谱、电化学以及直流和交流磁化率测量进行了表征。(RR)Mn(III)6Fe(II)和(RR)Fe(III)6Fe(II)中Fe(III)/Fe(II)电对的半波电位分别为E1/2 = +0.21和+0.75 V(相对于Fc(+)/Fc),这(i) 与游离Fe(II/III)(CN)6的氧化还原电对相比,对应于还原态Fe(II)物种的强烈稳定化,并且(ii) 表明与{(chand(RR))M(t)}(3+)单元(M(t) = Mn(III),Fe(III))的电子耦合存在显著差异。通过对自旋哈密顿量进行全矩阵对角化分析两种配合物的直流磁数据(μeff对T,VTVH),包括各向同性交换、零场分裂,并充分考虑D张量的相对取向和塞曼相互作用,结果表明(RR)Mn(III)6Fe(II)的JMn-Mn = +0.17 ± 0.02 cm(-1)且DMn = -3.4 ± 0.3 cm(-1),(RR)Fe(III)6Fe(II)的JFe-Fe = +0.235 ± 0.005 cm(-1)且DFe = 0,存在铁磁相互作用。将(RR)Mn(III)6Fe(II)和(RR)Fe(III)6Fe(II)的分子结构与使用非手性三联水杨醛配体(talen(t-Bu2))(6-)的七核配合物M(t)6M(c)的分子结构进行比较,结果表明配体折叠存在显著差异,中心间苯三酚环中的C-C键距离更小,HOMA值更大。这表明(RR)Mn(III)6Fe(II)和(RR)Fe(III)6Fe(II)具有更多的芳香性特征和更少的杂环二烯贡献,这解释了通过自旋极化机制更强的贡献,使得M(t)6M(c)中的反铁磁耦合转变为(RR)M(t)6M(c)中的铁磁耦合。这在描述中心间苯三酚单元芳香性的结构参数与观察到的交换耦合JMn-Mn之间建立了磁结构相关性。