Green Amy, Crawford Andrew, Button Katherine S, Wiles Nicola, Peters Tim J, Nutt David, Lewis Glyn
Centre for Academic Mental Health, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
J Affect Disord. 2014 Jul;163:40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.03.051. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
Using data from the GenPod trial this study investigates: (i) if depressed individuals with multiple physical symptoms have a poorer response to antidepressants before and after adjustment for baseline Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II); and (ii) if reboxetine is more effective than citalopram in depression with multiple physical symptoms.
Linear regression models were used to estimate differences in mean BDI-II score at 6 and 12 weeks.
Before adjusting for baseline BDI-II, the difference in mean BDI-II score between no and multiple physical symptoms was 4.5 (95% CI 1.87, 7.14) at 6 weeks, 4.51 (95% CI 1.60, 7.42) at 12 weeks. After adjustment for baseline BDI-II, there was no evidence of a difference in outcome according to physical symptoms with a difference in mean BDI-II of 2.17 (95% CI -0.39, 4.73) at 6 weeks and 2.43 (95% CI -0.46, 5.32) at 12 weeks. There was no evidence that reboxetine was more effective than citalopram in those with multiple physical symptoms at 6 (P=0.18) or 12 weeks (P=0.24).
Differential non-adherence between treatment arms has the potential to bias estimates of treatment efficacy.
Multiple physical symptoms predict response to antidepressants, but not after adjustment for baseline depression severity. Physical symptoms could be a marker of severe depression rather than an independent prognostic factor and depression should be considered in patients with multiple physical symptoms. Treatment with reboxetine conferred no advantage over citalopram in those with physical symptoms, and it is less well tolerated.
本研究利用GenPod试验的数据调查:(i)在对基线贝克抑郁量表第二版(BDI-II)进行调整前后,伴有多种躯体症状的抑郁个体对抗抑郁药的反应是否较差;以及(ii)瑞波西汀在伴有多种躯体症状的抑郁症中是否比西酞普兰更有效。
使用线性回归模型估计6周和12周时BDI-II平均得分的差异。
在对基线BDI-II进行调整之前,6周时无躯体症状组和多种躯体症状组之间BDI-II平均得分的差异为4.5(95%CI 1.87,7.14),12周时为4.51(95%CI 1.60,7.42)。在对基线BDI-II进行调整后,没有证据表明根据躯体症状的不同,结局存在差异,6周时BDI-II平均差异为2.17(95%CI -0.39,4.73),12周时为2.43(95%CI -0.46,5.32)。没有证据表明瑞波西汀在伴有多种躯体症状的患者中在6周(P=0.18)或12周(P=0.24)时比西酞普兰更有效。
治疗组之间的差异不依从性可能会使治疗效果的估计产生偏差。
多种躯体症状可预测对抗抑郁药的反应,但在对基线抑郁严重程度进行调整后则不然。躯体症状可能是重度抑郁的一个标志,而非独立的预后因素,对于伴有多种躯体症状的患者应考虑患有抑郁症。在伴有躯体症状的患者中,瑞波西汀治疗并不比西酞普兰更具优势,且耐受性较差。