Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Clin Radiol. 2014 Jul;69(7):721-6. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 May 13.
To evaluate the influence of attenuation-based tube potential selection (ATPS) in combination with organ-specific dose reduction (OSDR) on radiation dose and image quality of contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography (CT) examinations.
Seventy consecutive patients (59.2 ± 16.1 years; 49 men; 21 women) were randomized into two groups and underwent contrast-enhanced chest CT using a 128 section CT scanner. CT examinations were performed as standard protocol in group A (n = 35) and with the activated novel dose-saving devices, OSDR and ATPS, in group B (n = 35). Objective [signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)] and subjective image quality (five-point scale; 1 = non diagnostic; 5 = excellent) as well as radiation dose (CTDIvol) were analysed.
CTDIvol of the protocol using OSDR and ATPS was significantly lower than in standard chest CT examinations (3.4 ± 1 versus 6.1 ± 2.3 mGy; p < 0.001). Although the level of noise was slightly elevated in group B (14.1 ± 1.7 versus 11.4 ± 1.9 HU; p < 0.01), no significant differences in SNR (17.1 ± 5 versus 16.3 ± 4.7) or subjective image quality (mean score of 4.6 versus 4.4) were observed between both imaging protocols.
Attenuation-based tube potential selection in combination with organ-specific dose reduction essentially reduces the dose of chest CT in patients with normal body mass index (BMI) in clinical routine while maintaining subjective and objective image quality.
评估基于衰减的管电压选择(ATPS)与器官特异性剂量降低(OSDR)相结合对对比增强胸部 CT(CT)检查的辐射剂量和图像质量的影响。
连续 70 例患者(59.2±16.1 岁;49 名男性;21 名女性)被随机分为两组,并使用 128 层 CT 扫描仪进行对比增强胸部 CT 检查。组 A(n=35)行标准协议 CT 检查,组 B(n=35)采用激活的新型剂量节约装置 OSDR 和 ATPS。分析客观[信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)]和主观图像质量(五分制;1=非诊断;5=优秀)以及辐射剂量(CTDIvol)。
使用 OSDR 和 ATPS 的方案 CTDIvol 明显低于标准胸部 CT 检查(3.4±1 与 6.1±2.3 mGy;p<0.001)。尽管组 B 的噪声水平略有升高(14.1±1.7 与 11.4±1.9 HU;p<0.01),但两种成像方案的 SNR(17.1±5 与 16.3±4.7)或主观图像质量(平均评分 4.6 与 4.4)均无显著差异。
在临床常规中,对于正常 BMI 的患者,基于衰减的管电压选择与器官特异性剂量降低相结合,在不影响主观和客观图像质量的前提下,可显著降低胸部 CT 的剂量。