Suppr超能文献

韩国护理专业学生中的临床不当行为。

Clinical misconduct among South Korean nursing students.

作者信息

Park Eun-Jun, Park Seungmi, Jang In-Sun

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Konkuk University, Chungju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, Republic of Korea.

Department of Nursing, Hoseo University, Asan-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Dec;34(12):1467-73. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.04.006. Epub 2014 Apr 24.

Abstract

This study examines the extent and predictors of unethical clinical behaviors among nursing students in South Korea. From survey data of 345 undergraduate nursing students, unethical clinical behaviors were examined with respect to 11 individual characteristics, frequency and perceived seriousness of classroom cheating, two factors of individual attitude, and four contextual factors. Qualitative data from two focus group interviews were analyzed to explore reasons for and contexts of unethical clinical behaviors. About sixty-six percent of the participants engaged in one or more unethical clinical behaviors over a one-semester period. The prevalence of such behaviors varied widely from 1.7% to 40.9% and was related to the type of nursing program, the number of clinical practicum semesters completed, ethical attitudes toward cheating behaviors, the frequency of cheating on assignments, the frequency of cheating on exams, the perceived prevalence of cheating by peers, and prior knowledge of academic integrity. According to the regression analysis, the last four variables explained 29.4% of the variance in the prevalence of unethical clinical behaviors. In addition, multiple reasons and possible interventions for clinical misconduct were reported during the focus group interviews. Unlike cheating in the classroom, clinical misconduct was strongly induced by clinical nurses and poor clinical practice environments. In sum, unethical clinical behaviors were widespread among the participants and need to be corrected.

摘要

本研究调查了韩国护理专业学生不道德临床行为的程度及预测因素。根据对345名本科护理专业学生的调查数据,从11项个人特征、课堂作弊的频率和感知严重程度、个人态度的两个因素以及四个背景因素方面对不道德临床行为进行了考察。对来自两次焦点小组访谈的定性数据进行分析,以探究不道德临床行为的原因和背景。约66%的参与者在一个学期内有过一种或多种不道德临床行为。此类行为的发生率从1.7%到40.9%差异很大,且与护理项目类型、完成的临床实习学期数、对作弊行为的道德态度、作业作弊频率、考试作弊频率、感知到的同伴作弊发生率以及学术诚信的先验知识有关。根据回归分析,最后四个变量解释了不道德临床行为发生率差异的29.4%。此外,焦点小组访谈中报告了临床不当行为的多种原因及可能的干预措施。与课堂作弊不同,临床不当行为主要由临床护士和不良的临床实践环境诱发。总之,不道德临床行为在参与者中普遍存在,需要加以纠正。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验