Caravaglio N, Petti S, Benigni A, Paparo M G, De Leonardis D, Lepri B, Samà G
Ann Ig. 1989 Sep-Oct;1(5):1269-78.
Two different methods for making the subuletic bacterial antibiogram were compared, namely, the inhibition halo technique and that of percentage reduction. The first, of the more classical nature, is based on the introduction of the antibiotic inside a small cavity made in the culture medium, which leads to the formation of circular haloes around the cavity itself. The magnitude of the hales is all the greater, the more effective the antibiotic. The percentage-reduction technique calculates the reduction, expressed as a percentage, of the total number of colonies grown in the cultural medium containing the antibiotic, with respect to the number of colonies grown on a control culture-plate without antibiotic. Both techniques gave unambiguous results in 92.8% of the cases, both showing satisfactory validity; however, the percentage reduction technique proved to be more complex, to require fuller investigation and to be more expensive than the other. In fact, to make the antibiogram of a bacterial plaque concerning the seven antibiotics tested, 24 plates of agar-culture were necessary with the "r" method, whereas, with that of "inhibition haloes" only two sufficed. In addition, in the case of plaques with scarce microbial density or in the presence of highly invasive germs, by using the "inhibition haloes" method, it is always possible to have some information, which is impossible with the other method.
对两种制作亚抑菌细菌抗菌谱的不同方法进行了比较,即抑菌圈技术和抑菌率技术。第一种方法更具传统性质,是将抗生素引入培养基中制作的小腔室,这会导致在腔室周围形成圆形抑菌圈。抑菌圈越大,抗生素越有效。抑菌率技术计算在含有抗生素的培养基中生长的菌落总数相对于在不含抗生素的对照培养板上生长的菌落数的减少量,以百分比表示。两种技术在92.8%的案例中都给出了明确的结果,都显示出令人满意的有效性;然而,抑菌率技术被证明更复杂,需要更全面的研究,且比另一种技术成本更高。事实上,用“r”方法制作关于七种测试抗生素的菌斑抗菌谱,需要24个琼脂培养板,而用“抑菌圈”方法只需要两个就足够了。此外,对于微生物密度低的菌斑或存在高侵袭性细菌的情况,使用“抑菌圈”方法总能获得一些信息,而另一种方法则无法做到。