Fu Jun, Guo Zheng, Wang Zhen, Li Xiangdong, Fan Hongbin, Li Jing, Pei Yanjun, Pei Guoxian, Li Dan
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Mar;28(3):304-8.
To explore the effectiveness of excision and reconstruction of bone tumor by using operation guide plate made by variety of three-dimensional (3-D) printing techniques, and to compare the advantages and disadvantages of different 3-D printing techniques in the manufacture and application of operation guide plate.
Between September 2012 and January 2014, 31 patients with bone tumor underwent excision and reconstruction of bone tumor by using operation guide plate. There were 19 males and 12 females, aged 6-67 years (median, 23 years). The disease duration ranged from 15 days to 12 months (median, 2 months). There were 13 cases of malignant tumor and 18 cases of benign tumor. The tumor located in the femur (9 cases), the spine (7 cases), the tibia (6 cases), the pelvis (5 cases), the humerus (3 cases), and the fibula (1 case). Four kinds of 3-D printing technique were used in processing operation guide plate: fused deposition modeling (FDM) in 9 cases, stereo lithography appearance (SLA) in 14 cases, 3-D printing technique in 5 cases, and selective laser sintering (SLS) in 3 cases; the materials included ABS resin, photosensitive resin, plaster, and aluminum alloy, respectively. Before operation, all patients underwent thin layer CT scanning (0.625 mm) in addition to conventional imaging. The data were collected for tumor resection design, and operation guide plate was designed on the basis of excision plan. Preoperatively, the operation guide plates were made by 3-D printing equipment. After sterilization, the guide plates were used for excision and reconstruction of bone tumor. The time of plates processing cycle was recorded to analyse the efficiency of 4 kinds of 3-D printing techniques. The time for design and operation and intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency were recorded. Twenty-eight patients underwent similar operations during the same period as the control group.
The processing time of operation guide plate was (19.3 +/- 6.5) hours in FDM, (5.2 +/- 1.3) hours in SLA, (8.6 +/- 1.9) hours in 3-D printing technique, and (51.7 +/- 12.9) hours in SLS. The preoperative design and operation guide plate were successfully made, which was used for excision and reconstruction of bone tumor in 31 cases. Except 3 failures (operation guide plate fracture), the resection and reconstruction operations followed the preoperative design in the other 28 cases. The patients had longer design time, shorter operation time, and less fluoroscopy frequency than the patients of the control group, showing significant differences (P < 0.05). The follow-up time was 1-12 months (mean, 3.7 months). Postoperative X-ray and CT showed complete tumor resection and stable reconstruction.
3-D printing operation guide plates are well adapted to the requirements of individual operation for bone tumor resection and reconstruction. The 4 kinds of 3-D printing techniques have their own advantages and should be chosen according to the need of operation.
探讨采用多种三维(3-D)打印技术制作的手术导板在骨肿瘤切除与重建中的有效性,并比较不同3-D打印技术在手术导板制作及应用中的优缺点。
2012年9月至2014年1月,31例骨肿瘤患者采用手术导板行骨肿瘤切除与重建术。其中男19例,女12例,年龄6 - 67岁(中位数23岁)。病程15天至12个月(中位数2个月)。恶性肿瘤13例,良性肿瘤18例。肿瘤位于股骨9例、脊柱7例、胫骨6例、骨盆5例、肱骨3例、腓骨1例。采用4种3-D打印技术制作手术导板:熔融沉积成型(FDM)9例,立体光刻成型(SLA)14例,3-D打印技术5例,选择性激光烧结(SLS)3例;材料分别为ABS树脂、光敏树脂、石膏和铝合金。术前,所有患者除常规影像学检查外,均行薄层CT扫描(0.625 mm)。收集数据用于肿瘤切除设计,并根据切除计划设计手术导板。术前,通过3-D打印设备制作手术导板。消毒后,将导板用于骨肿瘤切除与重建。记录导板制作周期时间,分析4种3-D打印技术的效率。记录设计时间、手术时间及术中透视频率。同期28例患者行类似手术作为对照组。
FDM制作手术导板的时间为(19.3±6.5)小时,SLA为(5.2±1.3)小时,3-D打印技术为(8.6±1.9)小时,SLS为(51.7±12.9)小时。成功制作术前设计的手术导板,并用于31例骨肿瘤切除与重建。除3例失败(手术导板断裂)外,其余28例切除与重建手术均符合术前设计。与对照组患者相比,患者设计时间长、手术时间短、透视频率低,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。随访时间1 - 12个月(平均3.7个月)。术后X线及CT显示肿瘤切除彻底,重建稳定。
3-D打印手术导板很好地适应了骨肿瘤切除与重建个体化手术的要求。4种3-D打印技术各有优势,应根据手术需要选择。