Cosentino Maria, Beati Claudio, Fornari Simona, Capalbo Emanuela, Peli Michela, Lovisatti Maria, Cariati Maurizio, Cornalba Gianpaolo
Dipartimento di Scienze Diagnostiche, Unità Operativa Complessa di Radiologia, Ospedale San Carlo Borromeo, Via Pio II, 3, 20153, Milan, Italy,
Radiol Med. 2014 Nov;119(11):813-9. doi: 10.1007/s11547-014-0405-0. Epub 2014 May 21.
Colonic transit time and defaecography are well known, commonly used studies for evaluating patients with chronic constipation. The aim of this study was to compare colonic transit time with radiopaque markers and defaecography in female patients with obstructed defaecation.
In a prospective observational study, between January 2010 and December 2012, a total of 30 female patients, mean age 60 years, with symptoms of obstructed defaecation were subjected to colonic transit time and defaecography, and divided into two groups: normal or abnormal colon transit time. The results were statistically compared using the Chi-square test.
The comparison of data between colonic transit time and defaecography showed the following groups: group 1 (6/30 = 20 %) with normal colonic transit time but abnormal defaecography, and group 2 (24/30 = 80 %) with abnormal colonic transit time; the latter was further divided into two subgroups: group 2a (4/24 = 17 %), patients with inertia coli; group 2b (20/24 = 83 %), patients with impaired defaecation demonstrated at defaecography. There was a significant statistical difference between the radiological findings in these groups.
This study confirmed the value of both defaecography and colonic transit time in assessing clinically obstructed women. Obstructed defaecation might not always be associated with abnormal colonic transit time. Likewise, not all constipated patients had signs of obstructed defaecation. The differential diagnosis between colonic slow transit constipation and constipation due to pelvic floor disorders is essential for an adequate strategy of care.
结肠传输时间和排粪造影是评估慢性便秘患者常用的知名检查方法。本研究旨在比较不透X线标志物结肠传输时间和排粪造影在排便梗阻女性患者中的情况。
在一项前瞻性观察研究中,2010年1月至2012年12月期间,共30名平均年龄60岁、有排便梗阻症状的女性患者接受了结肠传输时间和排粪造影检查,并分为两组:结肠传输时间正常或异常。结果采用卡方检验进行统计学比较。
结肠传输时间和排粪造影数据比较显示以下几组:第1组(6/30 = 20%)结肠传输时间正常但排粪造影异常,第2组(24/30 = 80%)结肠传输时间异常;后者进一步分为两个亚组:第2a组(4/24 = 17%),结肠无力患者;第2b组(20/24 = 83%),排粪造影显示排便功能受损患者。这些组的影像学表现存在显著统计学差异。
本研究证实了排粪造影和结肠传输时间在评估临床排便梗阻女性中的价值。排便梗阻不一定总是与结肠传输时间异常相关。同样,并非所有便秘患者都有排便梗阻迹象。结肠慢传输型便秘与盆底功能障碍所致便秘的鉴别诊断对于制定适当的治疗策略至关重要。