Singh Gurjit, Lahiri Marc K, Khan Arfaat, Fang Kan D, Schuger Claudio D
Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, United States.
Cardiol J. 2015;22(1):57-67. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2014.0039. Epub 2014 May 20.
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads from Riata® family (St. Jude Medical Inc., Sylmar, CA, USA) have been recently recalled by Food and Drug Administration for concerns of a unique type of "inside-out" insulation failure leading to conductor externalization. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and predictors of conductor externalization in patients implanted with Riata 8 French (Fr) and 7 Fr leads.
Patients implanted with Riata® and Riata ST® who were actively followed up in our institution were scheduled for high resolution 3 view fluoroscopy and device interrogation including high voltage (HV) lead impedance testing. Fluoroscopic images were graded as presence of externalization or no externalization.
Of the 90 patients who underwent screening fluoroscopy, majority had dual coil leads (62.5%) and median duration from the implant time to screening was 79.5 months. Twenty four (26.7%) patients exhibited evidence of lead externalization with 10 (41.6%) of these showing electrical abnormalities at the time of screening. No externalization was seen in the 7 Fr leads. Pacing thresholds were significantly elevated in the externalized cohort compared to non-externalized group (1.42 ± 1.23 vs. 0.93 ± 0.53; p = 0.01). Time since lead implant and lead diameter emerged as significant predictors of lead externalization on univariate analysis with only lead diameter being significant on multivariate analysis (odds ratio 30.68; 4.95-∞, p = 0.001).
Prevalence of insulation failure exhibiting as conductor externalization is high (26.7%) among the large diameter 8 Fr Riata® leads with a significant proportion of patients manifesting electrical failure. High resolution 3 view fluoroscopy is a reasonable approach to screen for this unique type of insulation failure.
由于担心一种独特的“由内向外”绝缘故障会导致导线外露,美国食品药品监督管理局最近召回了圣犹达医疗公司(位于美国加利福尼亚州西尔玛)生产的Riata®系列植入式心脏复律除颤器导线。本研究的目的是评估植入Riata 8法国(Fr)和7 Fr导线的患者中导线外露的发生率及预测因素。
在我们机构接受积极随访的植入Riata®和Riata ST®的患者被安排进行高分辨率三视角荧光透视检查及设备问询,包括高压(HV)导线阻抗测试。荧光透视图像根据是否存在导线外露进行分级。
在接受筛查荧光透视检查的90例患者中,大多数为双线圈导线(62.5%),从植入时间到筛查的中位时间为79.5个月。24例(26.7%)患者有导线外露的证据,其中10例(41.6%)在筛查时显示出电气异常。7 Fr导线未见导线外露。与未发生导线外露的组相比,发生导线外露的队列中的起搏阈值显著升高(1.42±1.23对0.93±0.53;p = 0.01)。在单因素分析中,自导线植入后的时间和导线直径是导线外露的显著预测因素,而在多因素分析中只有导线直径具有显著性(比值比30.68;4.95 - ∞,p = 0.001)。
在大直径8 Fr Riata®导线中,表现为导线外露的绝缘故障发生率很高(26.7%),相当一部分患者存在电气故障。高分辨率三视角荧光透视检查是筛查这种独特类型绝缘故障的合理方法。