• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

3.0T 磁共振扩散加权成像对胰腺癌采集的优化

Optimization of MR diffusion-weighted imaging acquisitions for pancreatic cancer at 3.0T.

作者信息

Yao Xiuzhong, Kuang Tiantao, Wu Li, Feng Hao, Liu Hao, Cheng Weizhong, Rao Shengxiang, Wang He, Zeng Mengsu

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, No. 138, Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Medical Image, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, No. 138, Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China.

Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, No. 138, Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China.

出版信息

Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Sep;32(7):875-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.04.011. Epub 2014 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.mri.2014.04.011
PMID:24848293
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate and optimize diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) acquisitions for pancreatic cancer at 3.0T.

METHODS

Forty-five patients with pancreatic cancer were examined by four DWI acquisitions with b values=0 and 600s/mm(2) at 3.0T, including breath-holding DWI (BH-DWI), respiratory-triggered DWI (TRIG-DWI), respiratory-triggered DWI with inversion-recovery technique (TRIGIR-DWI), and free-breathing DWI with inversion-recovery technique (FBIR-DWI). Artifacts, contrast ratio (CR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of pancreatic cancer were statistically compared among DWI acquisitions.

RESULTS

TRIGIR-DWI displayed the lowest artifacts and highest CR compared to other DWI acquisitions. CNRs of pancreatic cancer in TRIG-DWI and TRIGIR-DWI were statistically higher than that in FBIR-DWI and BH-DWI. Different ADCs between pancreatic cancer and noncancerous pancreatic tissues were noticed by a paired-samples T test in TRIG-DWI (p=0.017), TRIGIR-DWI (p=0.00001) and FBIR-DWI (p=0.000041).

CONCLUSIONS

TRIGIR-DWI may be the optimal acquisition of DWI for pancreatic cancer at 3.0T.

摘要

目的

研究并优化3.0T场强下胰腺癌的扩散加权成像(DWI)采集方法。

方法

45例胰腺癌患者在3.0T场强下采用四种DWI采集方法进行检查,b值分别为0和600s/mm²,包括屏气DWI(BH-DWI)、呼吸触发DWI(TRIG-DWI)、采用反转恢复技术的呼吸触发DWI(TRIGIR-DWI)以及采用反转恢复技术的自由呼吸DWI(FBIR-DWI)。对不同DWI采集方法下胰腺癌的伪影、对比率(CR)、对比噪声比(CNR)及表观扩散系数(ADC)进行统计学比较。

结果

与其他DWI采集方法相比,TRIGIR-DWI的伪影最少,CR最高。TRIG-DWI和TRIGIR-DWI中胰腺癌的CNR在统计学上高于FBIR-DWI和BH-DWI。在TRIG-DWI(p=0.017)、TRIGIR-DWI(p=0.00001)和FBIR-DWI(p=0.000041)中,通过配对样本t检验发现胰腺癌与胰腺非癌组织之间存在不同的ADC值。

结论

TRIGIR-DWI可能是3.0T场强下胰腺癌DWI的最佳采集方法。

相似文献

1
Optimization of MR diffusion-weighted imaging acquisitions for pancreatic cancer at 3.0T.3.0T 磁共振扩散加权成像对胰腺癌采集的优化
Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Sep;32(7):875-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.04.011. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
2
Evaluation of ADC measurements among solid pancreatic masses by respiratory-triggered diffusion-weighted MR imaging with inversion-recovery fat-suppression technique at 3.0T.3.0T 呼吸触发反转恢复脂肪抑制弥散加权成像技术中 ADC 值在胰腺实性肿块中的评估。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 May;31(4):524-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
3
Comparison of breathhold, navigator-triggered, and free-breathing diffusion-weighted MRI for focal hepatic lesions.屏气、导航触发和自由呼吸扩散加权 MRI 对肝脏局灶性病变的比较。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Jul;38(1):109-18. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23949. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
4
Comparison and reproducibility of ADC measurements in breathhold, respiratory triggered, and free-breathing diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver.屏气、呼吸触发和自由呼吸肝脏扩散加权磁共振成像中表观扩散系数(ADC)测量值的比较及可重复性
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Nov;28(5):1141-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21569.
5
Simultaneous multislice diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver: Analysis of different breathing schemes in comparison to standard sequences.肝脏的同时多层扩散加权磁共振成像:与标准序列相比的不同呼吸方案分析。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Oct;44(4):865-79. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25204. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
6
Quantitative comparison of MR diffusion-weighted imaging for liver focal lesions between 3.0T and 1.5T: Regions of interest of the minimum-spot ADC, the largest possible solid part, and the maximum diameter in lesions.3.0T与1.5T磁共振扩散加权成像对肝脏局灶性病变的定量比较:病变内最小点表观扩散系数、最大可能实性部分及最大直径的感兴趣区
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Nov;44(5):1320-1329. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25277. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
7
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the liver using tracking only navigator echo: feasibility study.仅使用跟踪导航回波的肝脏弥散加权磁共振成像:可行性研究。
Invest Radiol. 2010 Feb;45(2):57-63. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181cc25ed.
8
Optimization and Clinical Feasibility of Free-breathing Diffusion-weighted Imaging of the Liver: Comparison with Respiratory-Triggered Diffusion-weighted Imaging.肝脏自由呼吸扩散加权成像的优化与临床可行性:与呼吸触发扩散加权成像的比较
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2015;14(2):123-32. doi: 10.2463/mrms.2014-0032. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
9
Respiratory-triggered versus breath-hold diffusion-weighted MRI of liver lesions: comparison of image quality and apparent diffusion coefficient values.肝脏病变的呼吸触发与屏气扩散加权磁共振成像:图像质量与表观扩散系数值的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Apr;192(4):915-22. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1260.
10
Reproducibility of measurement of apparent diffusion coefficients of malignant hepatic tumors: effect of DWI techniques and calculation methods.肝脏恶性肿瘤表观扩散系数测量的可重复性:DWI 技术和计算方法的影响。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Nov;36(5):1131-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23744. Epub 2012 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Toward diffusion MRI in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer.胰腺癌诊断与治疗中的扩散磁共振成像研究进展
Med Oncol. 2025 May 28;42(7):222. doi: 10.1007/s12032-025-02759-5.
2
Various diffusion magnetic resonance imaging techniques for pancreatic cancer.用于胰腺癌的各种扩散磁共振成像技术。
World J Radiol. 2015 Dec 28;7(12):424-37. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v7.i12.424.
3
Pancreatic cancer serum biomarker PC-594: Diagnostic performance and comparison to CA19-9.胰腺癌血清生物标志物PC-594:诊断性能及与CA19-9的比较
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun 7;21(21):6604-12. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i21.6604.